Wright, Jonathan Lee ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •               IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-88,000-01
    EX PARTE JONATHAN LEE WRIGHT, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. W07-34527-X(A)
    IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 6
    FROM DALLAS COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual
    assault of a child and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed
    his conviction. Wright v. State, No. 05-14-00987-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Apr. 29, 2015) (not
    designated for publication).
    Applicant contends, among other things, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective
    assistance because counsel failed to advise him of his right to petition pro se for discretionary
    review.
    2
    Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
    
    466 U.S. 668
    (1984); Ex parte Wilson, 
    956 S.W.2d 25
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). In these
    circumstances, additional facts are needed. Pursuant to Ex parte Rodriguez, 
    334 S.W.2d 294
    , 294
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
    shall order appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on
    appeal concerning whether Applicant was notified of his right to seek discretionary review pro se.
    The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
    If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
    If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
    attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
    The trial court shall make supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether
    Applicant’s appellate counsel timely informed Applicant that he has a right to file a pro se petition
    for discretionary review. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions
    of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas
    corpus relief.
    This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
    issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
    affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
    deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
    be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
    be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
    3
    Filed: March 28, 2018
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-88,000-01

Filed Date: 3/28/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/28/2018