Wood, Johnathan Lee ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-87,315-02
    EX PARTE JOHNATHAN LEE WOOD, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 1323123B IN THE 8TH DISTRICT COURT
    FROM HOPKINS COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual
    abuse of a child and sentenced to life in prison.
    Applicant contends that his trial and appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because
    both counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. The habeas record has no response from either
    lawyer, and there are no findings from the trial court.
    Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
    
    466 U.S. 668
    (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 
    993 S.W.2d 114
    , 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte
    2
    Axel, 
    757 S.W.2d 369
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed.
    As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 
    334 S.W.2d 294
    , 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is
    the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order both trial and appellate counsel
    to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any
    means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
    If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
    If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
    attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant
    was denied his right to a meaningful appeal because Applicant’s counsel failed to timely file a notice
    of appeal. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it
    deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
    This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
    issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
    affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
    deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
    be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
    be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
    Filed: March 28, 2018
    Do not publish