Jones, William Monterial ( 2018 )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-86,603-03
EX PARTE WILLIAM MONTERIAL JONES, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 1387546-A IN THE 351ST DISTRICT COURT
FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated
robbery with a deadly weapon and sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment. The First Court of
Appeals affirmed his conviction. Jones v. State, Nos. 01-14-01032-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st
Dist.] Feb. 18, 2016)(not designated for publication).
Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance
because counsel failed to present medical records and interview and subpoena medical staff to show
that Applicant was severely injured and would have been unable to run from the crime scene.
2
On February 9, 2018, the trial court signed findings of fact and conclusions of law
recommended denying relief. In its findings, the trial court erroneously stated that Applicant failed
to show that any medical personnel was available to testify on Applicant’s behalf. Applicant has
provided an affidavit, purporting to be from a nurse, Kelly Russell, who states that Applicant could
not have run any distance due to his injuries.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these
circumstances, additional facts are needed. Counsel has provided an affidavit. However, it is this
Court’s opinion that more information is needed before this Court can render a decision on the
aforementioned grounds for review, and because this Court cannot hear evidence, Ex parte
Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum.
The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether counsel was deficient for failing to
present Applicant’s medical record. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether counsel
was deficient for failing to present testimony from Kelly Russell to testify that Applicant’s injuries
would have prevented him from running away or fleeing from a crime scene. If the trial court finds
counsel did not have a reasonable trial strategy for presenting medical evidence or medical
testimony, then the court shall determine whether Applicant was prejudiced under the second prong
of Strickland.
3
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: March 28, 2018
Do not publish