Duvall, Eric Matsumura ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-93,712-01
    EX PARTE ERIC MATSUMURA DUVALL, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 20160D01661-DCR1-1 IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1
    FROM EL PASO COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Applicant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life without parole years’
    imprisonment. The Eighth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Duvall v. State, No. 08-19-
    00313-CR (Tex. App. – El Paso, Sept. 29, 2021). Applicant filed this application for a writ of
    habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX .
    CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
    Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that his
    conviction had been affirmed and advise him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary
    review. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Wilson, 
    956 S.W.2d 25
     (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow, 
    180 S.W.3d 135
     (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
    2
    Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings
    of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order appellate counsel to
    respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out
    in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether
    Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court
    shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If
    counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s
    name.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate
    counsel timely informed Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and that he had a right to
    file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court shall also determine whether Applicant
    would have timely filed a petition for discretionary review but for appellate counsel’s alleged
    deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems
    appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
    the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
    findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
    affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
    hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
    by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
    Filed: December 21, 2022
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-93,712-01

Filed Date: 12/21/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/26/2022