James, Raymond Ladaniel ( 2022 )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-94,099-01
EX PARTE RAYMOND LADANIEL JAMES, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 1071604-A IN THE 262ND DISTRICT COURT
FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam. NEWELL, J. concurred.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fourteenth
Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. James v. State, No. 14-07-00274-CR (Tex.
App.—Houston [14th Dist] Mar. 6, 2008)(not designated for publication). Applicant filed this
application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded
it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
This habeas application was filed in the trial court on October 8, 2012. A timely order
designating issues was signed on October 30, 2012. No further action was taken by the county until
the application was forwarded to this Court and received in August 2022. There is no indication as
to why this application was pending in Harris County for so long without any action by the clerk or
2
the trial court.
Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that his
conviction had been affirmed and advise him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary
review. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Wilson, 956
S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow, 180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings
of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
As a preliminary matter, the trial court shall make findings of fact as to why no action was
taken by the trial court or the clerk between the entry of the order designating issues and the
forwarding of the application to this Court. The trial court shall obtain a response from Applicant
as to whether Applicant still wants to pursue this application, and shall include that response in the
supplemental record. If the trial court is unable to obtain such a response from Applicant, the trial
court shall detail the efforts that were made to obtain a response from Applicant. The trial court shall
then return the application to this Court.
If Applicant indicates that he does want to pursue this application, the trial court shall order
appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use
any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine
whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the
trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.
26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of
counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate
3
counsel timely informed Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and that he had a right to
file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court shall also determine whether Applicant
would have timely filed a petition for discretionary review but for appellate counsel’s alleged
deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems
appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: December 7, 2022
Do not publish