Pettigrew, Kendrick Lamar ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-85,886-01
    EX PARTE KENDRICK LAMAR PETTIGREW, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 114-1595-15-A IN THE 114TH DISTRICT COURT
    FROM SMITH COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    ORDER
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of driving while
    intoxicated - 3rd or more habitual and sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. He did not
    appeal his conviction.
    Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because counsel advised Applicant
    incorrectly as to his parole eligibility. Ex parte Moussazadeh, 
    361 S.W.3d 684
    , 691–92 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 2012). Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these
    circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 
    334 S.W.2d 294
    , 294
    2
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court
    may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
    If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
    If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
    attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
    The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant’s
    claim that his plea was involuntary. The trial court shall make specific findings as to whether counsel
    told Applicant that he would be eligible for parole in one year and ten months. If the court finds
    counsel erred, it shall make specific findings as to whether there is a reasonable probability that, but
    for counsel’s errors, Applicant would have insisted on a trial. The trial court shall also make any
    other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition
    of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
    This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
    issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
    affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
    deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
    be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
    be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
    Filed: November 9, 2016
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-85,886-01

Filed Date: 11/9/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2016