United States v. Jose Alvarado-Manriquez ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT FOR PUBLICATION                           FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        SEP 29 2017
    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No. 17-50010
    Plaintiff-Appellee,             D.C. No. 3:16-cr-02173-BEN
    v.
    MEMORANDUM*
    JOSE LUIS ALVARADO-MANRIQUEZ,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of California
    Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding
    Submitted September 26, 2017**
    Before:      SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    Jose Luis Alvarado-Manriquez appeals from the district court’s judgment
    and challenges the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea
    conviction for improper entry by an alien, in violation of 
    8 U.S.C. § 1325
    .
    Pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), Alvarado-Manriquez’s
    *
    This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
    except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
    **
    The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
    without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a
    motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Alvarado-Manriquez
    the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or
    answering brief has been filed.
    Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
    Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
    AFFIRMED.
    2                                    17-50010
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-50010

Filed Date: 9/29/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2017