Hinkley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 19-1858V
    UNPUBLISHED
    KARA HINKLEY,                                           Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                         Filed: April 30, 2021
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                 Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                         Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
    Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                          Administration (SIRVA)
    Chad Ray Donnahoo, Brian Elston Law, Asheville, NC, for petitioner.
    Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1
    On December 9, 2019, Kara Hinkley filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to
    Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of her September 10, 2018 influenza (“flu”)
    vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the
    Office of Special Masters.
    On April 29, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that
    Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report and
    Proffer on Compensation at 1. Specifically, Respondent indicates that
    1
    Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
    to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act
    of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
    Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
    with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
    the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
    the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
    (2012).
    [m]edical personnel at the Division of Injury Compensation Programs
    (“DICP”), Department of Health and Human Services, have reviewed the
    petition and medical records filed in this case, as well as the relevant
    medical literature regarding petitioner’s alleged injury. Based on that review,
    DICP concluded that petitioner suffered a Table SIRVA. No other causes
    for petitioner’s SIRVA were identified. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-13(a)(1)(B).
    In addition, given the medical records outlined above, the statutory six
    month sequela requirement has been satisfied. See id. § 300aa-11(c)(D)(I).
    Therefore, based on the current record, petitioner has satisfied all legal
    prerequisites for compensation under the Act.
    Id. at 4 (footnote omitted). Respondent further agrees that
    [w]ith respect to other statutory and jurisdictional issues, the records show
    that the case was timely filed, that the vaccine was received in the United
    States, and that petitioner satisfies the statutory severity requirement by
    suffering the residual effects or complications of her injury for more than six
    months after vaccine administration. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-11(c)(1)(D)(i).
    Petitioner avers that no civil action or proceedings have been pursued in
    connection with the vaccine-related injury. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-11(a)(5)
    and -11(c)(1)(E); Am. Pet. at 2.
    Id.
    In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
    Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-1858

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 6/1/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/2/2021