Ward v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 19-1698V
    UNPUBLISHED
    LINDSAY WARD,                                           Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                         Filed: April 30, 2021
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                 Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                         Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
    Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                          Administration (SIRVA)
    Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
    Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1
    On October 31, 2019, Lindsay Ward filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a shoulder injury related to
    vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) caused by an influenza vaccine administered on
    September 30, 2018. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit
    of the Office of Special Masters.
    On April 29, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that
    Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.
    Specifically, Respondent has reviewed the facts of this case and concluded that
    Petitioner’s claim meets the Table criteria for a SIRVA. Id. at 4. Respondent further
    1
    Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
    to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act
    of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
    Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
    with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
    the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
    the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
    (2012).
    agrees that Petitioner has satisfied the statutory and jurisdictional requirements and
    concedes entitlement to compensation in this case. Id.
    In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
    Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-1698

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 6/4/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/4/2021