Mayer v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 20-1434V
    UNPUBLISHED
    JANICE E. MAYER,                                        Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                         Filed: May 18, 2021
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                 Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                         Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
    Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)
    Respondent.
    Richard H. Moeller, Moore, Heffernan, et al., Sioux City, IA, for petitioner.
    Lauren Kells, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
    On October 22, 2020, Janice E. Mayer filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from Guillain Barre Syndrome as a
    result of an influenza vaccine received on September 24, 2018. Petition at 1-4. The case
    was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On May 17, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that
    Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.
    Specifically, Respondent agrees that “petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the
    Vaccine Injury Table (Table) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (QAI), which
    afford petitioner a presumption of causation if the onset of GBS occurs between three
    1
    Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
    to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act
    of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
    Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
    with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
    the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
    the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
    § 300aa (2012).
    and forty-two days after a seasonal flu vaccination and there is no apparent alternative
    cause. Id. at 6.
    In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
    Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-1434

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 6/17/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/18/2021