Roubik v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 20-1473V
    UNPUBLISHED
    JULIE ROUBIK, personal                                      Chief Special Master Corcoran
    representative of ESTATE OF
    THOMAS ROUBIK,                                              Filed: May 21, 2021
    Petitioner,
    v.                                                          Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Barre Syndrome (GBS)
    Respondent.
    Nancy Routh Meyers, Turning Point Litigation, Greensboro, NC, for Petitioner.
    Lauren Kells, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    .
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On October 27, 2020, Julie Roubik filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”), as personal representative of the estate of Thomas Roubik. Petitioner
    alleged that “[a]s a direct and proximate result of the reaction to the influenza vaccination
    administered to Thomas Roubik on November 8, 2019, he suffered from the effects of
    Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) which ultimately lead to his untimely death.” Petition at ¶
    16. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special
    Masters.
    On April 16, 2021, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to
    compensation for Thomas Roubik’s injury. On May 21, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer
    1  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
    (2012).
    on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded
    $328,212.87, representing compensation in the amounts of $250,000.00 for the death
    benefit, $77,500.00 for pain and suffering, and $712.87 for unreimbursed expenses.
    Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the
    proffered award. Id. at 2. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled
    to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $328,212.87, representing compensation in the amounts of
    $250,000.00 for the death benefit, $77,500.00 for pain and suffering, and $712.87 for
    unreimbursed expenses in the form of a check payable to Petitioner, as the legal
    representative of Thomas Roubik’s estate.3 This amount represents compensation for
    all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.4
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3 The Proffer indicates that Petitioner will provide documentation showing her appointment as the legal
    representative of Thomas Roubik’s estate before any payment is made. Proffer at 2 n.1. Additionally, if
    another individual is appointed as the legal representative, payment will be made to that individual. Id.
    4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    ____________________________________
    )
    JULIE ROUBIK, PERSONAL               )
    REPRESENTATIVE OF THE                )
    ESTATE OF THOMAS ROUBIK,             )
    )
    Petitioner,             )
    )   No. 20-1473V
    v.                            )   Chief Special Master Corcoran
    )   ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND             )
    HUMAN SERVICES,                     )
    )
    Respondent.             )
    ____________________________________)
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On October 27, 2020, Julie Roubik (“petitioner”), personal representative of the estate of
    Thomas Roubik (“decedent”), filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood
    Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that
    the decedent suffered Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table,
    following administration of an influenza vaccine he received on November 8, 2019; petitioner
    further alleged that the decedent passed away due to complications of GBS on January 11, 2020.
    See generally Petition. On April 16, 2021, the Secretary of Health and Human Services
    (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation
    under the terms of the Act for a GBS Table injury, and the same day, the Chief Special Master
    issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF Nos. 15, 16.
    I.     Items of Compensation
    Based upon the evidence, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded a lump
    sum of $328,212.87 ($250,000.00 for the death benefit; $77,500.00 for pain and suffering; and
    $712.87 for unreimbursed expenses). This amount represents all elements of compensation to
    which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    Respondent recommends that compensation be awarded to petitioner in the amount of
    $328,212.87, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, as the legal representative of the
    decedent’s estate. 1 Petitioner agrees.
    Respectfully submitted,
    BRIAN M. BOYNTON
    Acting Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
    Acting Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/ Lauren Kells
    LAUREN KELLS
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel.: (202) 616-4187
    Email: Lauren.Kells@usdoj.gov
    1
    Before payment on a judgment can be made in this case, respondent will require petitioner to
    provide documentation establishing her appointment as legal representatives of the decedent’s
    estate. If petitioner is not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as the legal
    representative of the decedent’s estate, then such payment on any judgment shall be made to the
    party or parties appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as legal representative of
    the decedent’s estate.
    2
    DATED: May 21, 2021
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-1473

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 6/21/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/22/2021