Coutu v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 19-548V
    (not to be published)
    DEBORAH COUTU,
    Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,
    v.                                                          Filed: May 21, 2021
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Special Processing Unit                 (SPU);
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Attorney’s Fees and Costs
    Respondent.
    Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for
    Petitioner.
    James Vincent Lopez, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1
    On April 15, 2019, Deborah Coutu filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Administration as a result of an influenza vaccine administered to her on February 8,
    2018. (Petition at 1). On October 20, 2020, a decision was issued awarding compensation
    to Petitioner based on the Respondent’s proffer. (ECF No. 30).
    1
    Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If , upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all “§” ref erences to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
    (2012).
    Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated April 26, 2021
    (ECF No. 35), requesting a total award of $34,319.98 (representing $33,114.40 in fees
    and $1,205.58 in costs). In accordance with General Order No. 9, Petitioner filed a signed
    statement indicating that she incurred out-of-pocket expenses in the amount of $413.00.
    (Id. at 2). Respondent reacted to the motion on April 27, 2021, indicating that he is
    satisfied that the statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met
    in this case, but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. (ECF
    No. 36). Petitioner did not file a reply thereafter.
    I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my
    experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested
    hours or rates.
    The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
    Section 15(e). Accordingly, Petitioner is awarded the total amount of $34,732.98 3
    as follows:
    •    A lump sum of $34,319.98, representing reimbursement for
    attorneys’ fees and costs, in the form of a check payable jointly to
    Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel; and
    •    A lump sum of $413.00, representing reimbursement for Petitioner’s
    costs, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.
    In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of
    the Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 4
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3
    This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all
    charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered.
    Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would
    be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.,
    
    924 F.2d 1029
     (Fed. Cir.1991).
    4
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by f iling a joint notice
    renouncing their right to seek review.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-548

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 6/21/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/22/2021