Hull v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •          In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 18-723V
    Filed: April 18, 2019
    UNPUBLISHED
    BETHANNE HULL,
    Petitioner,
    v.                                                       Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                  Tetanus Diphtheria acellular
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                          Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                           Administration (SIRVA)
    Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
    Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
    respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On May 22, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
    Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine
    Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of receiving a Tetanus diphtheria acellular pertussis
    (“Tdap”) vaccine on May 22, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special
    Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On April 3, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to
    compensation for a SIRVA. On April 17, 2019, respondent filed a proffer on award of
    1 The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website.
    This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with
    Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
    the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the
    undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such
    material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the
    action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims'
    website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal
    Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $70,000.00. Proffer at
    1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered
    award. 
    Id. Based on
    the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is
    entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
    petitioner a lump sum payment of $70,000.00 in the form of a check payable to
    petitioner, Bethanne Hull. This amount represents compensation for all damages that
    would be available under § 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    BETHANNE HULL,
    Petitioner,                          No. 18-723V
    Chief Special Master Dorsey
    v.                                                 ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    I.        Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items
    On April 1, 2019, respondent concededed that entitlement to compensation was
    appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. Thereafter, on April 3, 2019, Chief Special
    Master Dorsey issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine
    compensation for her Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”). Based on
    the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $70,000.00. This
    amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42
    U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 1 Petitioner agrees.
    II.       Form of the Award
    The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through
    a lump sum payment of $70,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner
    agrees.
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings
    and future pain and suffering.
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOSEPH H. HUNT
    Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/ Mallori B. Openchowski
    MALLORI B. OPENCHOWSKI
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146, Ben Franklin Station
    Washington, DC 20044-0146
    Tel.: (202) 305-0660
    DATED: April 17, 2019
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-723

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 8/7/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/8/2019