Snow v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                  In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 14-754V
    (Not to be published)
    *****************************
    *
    KEITH SNOW, on behalf of R.S., a minor child, *
    *                           Filed: February 22, 2016
    Petitioner,                  *
    *                           Decision by Stipulation; Attorney’s
    v.                                  *                           Fees & Costs
    *
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                       *
    HUMAN SERVICES,                               *
    *
    Respondent.                  *
    *
    *****************************
    Anne Carrión Toale, Maglio Christopher and Toale, Sarasota, FL, for Petitioner
    Jennifer Reynaud, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent
    ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS DECISION1
    On August 20, 2014, Keith Snow filed a petition on behalf of R.S., a minor child, seeking
    compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. On February 19, 2016,
    the parties filed a stipulation detailing an amount to be awarded to Petitioner. I subsequently issued
    a decision finding the parties’ stipulation to be reasonable and granting Petitioner the award
    outlined by the stipulation.
    Counsel for both parties have now filed another joint stipulation, this time in regards to
    attorney’s fees and costs. The parties have stipulated that Petitioner’s counsel should receive a
    lump sum of $17,000.00, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel.
    1
    Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for my action in this case, I will post this decision on the
    United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-
    347, § 205, 
    116 Stat. 2899
    , 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002) (current version at 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     (2014)). As provided by 42
    U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the posted decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of
    confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request
    redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance
    and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would
    constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole decision will be
    available to the public. (Id.)
    This amount represents a sum to which Respondent does not object. In addition, and in compliance
    with General Order No. 9, Petitioner has represented that he did incur any reimbursable costs in
    proceeding on this petition.
    I approve the requested amount for attorney’s fees and costs as reasonable. Accordingly,
    an award should be made in the form of a check in the amount of $17,000.00 payable jointly to
    Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Anne Carrión Toale, Esq. The award shall be forwarded to
    Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, 1604 Main Street, Suite 710, Sarasota Florida 34236. In the
    absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL
    ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.2
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    /s/ Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Special Master
    2
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their
    right to seek review.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-754

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 3/14/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021