Miskell v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •          In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 18-526V
    Filed: May 28, 2019
    UNPUBLISHED
    JESSICA MISKELL,
    Petitioner,
    v.                                                       Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                  Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                          Injury Related to Vaccine
    Administration (SIRVA)
    Respondent.
    Gary Alan Krochmal, Law Offices of Gary A. Krochmal, PLLC, Farmington Hills, MI, for
    petitioner.
    Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On April 10, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
    Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine
    Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) following receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on
    October 4, 2015. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit
    of the Office of Special Masters.
    On April 30, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to
    compensation for a SIRVA. On May 28, 2019, respondent filed a proffer on award of
    1 The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website.
    This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with
    Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
    the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the
    undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such
    material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the
    action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims'
    website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal
    Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $65,000.00. Proffer at
    1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered
    award. 
    Id. Based on
    the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is
    entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
    petitioner a lump sum payment of $65,000.00 in the form of a check payable to
    petitioner, Jessica Miskell. This amount represents compensation for all damages
    that would be available under § 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    JESSICA MISKELL,
    Petitioner,
    No. 18-526V
    v.                                            Chief Special Master Dorsey
    ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    I.        Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items
    On April 29, 2019, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report conceding that petitioner is
    entitled to vaccine compensation for her Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
    (“SIRVA”) injury. The Chief Special Master’s Ruling on Entitlement, adopting respondent’s
    recommendation, was issued the next day, on April 30, 2019.
    Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
    $65,000.00. This is comprised solely of pain and suffering, and represents all elements of
    compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 1 Petitioner
    agrees.
    1
    Should Petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future pain and
    suffering.
    1
    II.       Form of the Award
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
    through a lump sum payment of $65,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 2
    Petitioner agrees.
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOSEPH H. HUNT
    Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    ALEXIS BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/ Adriana Teitel
    ADRIANA TEITEL
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, DC 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 616-3677
    Dated: May 28, 2019
    2
    Petitioner is a competent adult, therefore evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-526

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 8/21/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/21/2019