Burkart v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                  In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    Filed: March 26, 2015
    * * * * * * * *                 *   *   *   *   * *       UNPUBLISHED
    ASHLEY BURKART,                                   *       No. 14-581V
    *
    Petitioner,                     *
    *       Special Master Dorsey
    v.                                                *
    *       Attorneys’ Fees and Costs;
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                               *       Reasonable Amount Requested to which
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                               *       Respondent Does not Object.
    *
    Respondent.                     *
    *
    *    *   *   *    *   *   *     *   *   *   *   * *
    Thomas P. Gallagher, Somers Point, NJ, for petitioner.
    Jennifer Leigh Reynaud, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS DECISION1
    On July 9, 2014, Ashley Burkart (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation pursuant
    to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006).
    Petitioner alleged that she received a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (TDaP) vaccination in
    her left shoulder on September 2, 2012, and subsequently suffered a shoulder injury related ton
    vaccine administration (SIRVA). See Petition at Introduction. On March 9, 2015, the
    undersigned entered a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on a joint stipulation
    filed by the parties.
    1
    Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
    the undersigned intends to post this decision on the website of the United States Court of Federal
    Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 
    116 Stat. 2899
    ,
    2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which
    to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or
    commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes
    medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted
    invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the entire decision will be available to the
    public. 
    Id.
    2
    The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
    Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    , codified as amended,
    42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to
    individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.
    1
    On March 26, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Facts Concerning Final Attorneys’
    Fees and Costs. According to the stipulation, the parties stipulate to a total award to petitioner of
    attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $16,600.00. In accordance with General Order #9,
    petitioner’s counsel states that petitioner advanced $400.00, in reimbursable costs in pursuit of
    her claim.
    The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 
    42 U.S.C. § 300
     aa-15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request and the lack of any objection
    by respondent, the undersigned GRANTS the request for approval and payment of attorneys’
    fees and costs.
    Accordingly, an award should be made as follows:
    (1) in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and to petitioner’s attorney,
    Thomas P. Gallagher, in the amount of $16,600.00, and
    (2) in the form of a check payable to petitioner only in the amount of $400.00.
    In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
    the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’
    stipulation.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of
    notice renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-581

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 4/16/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2015