Copeland v. Hhs ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 98-618V
    (Not to be published)
    *************************
    *
    WENDELL LEE COPELAND               *
    and KAREN COPELAND, as             *
    parents of K.C.C., a minor,        *
    *
    Petitioners, *
    *                                      Filed: March 31, 2015
    v.                  *
    *                                      Decision on Attorneys’
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND            *                                      Fees and Costs
    HUMAN SERVICES                     *
    *
    Respondent.  *
    *
    *************************
    DECISION (ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS)
    In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,1 I issued a
    decision on August 7, 2014. On March 27, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation Regarding Final
    Attorneys’ Fees and Costs in this matter. The parties’ stipulation requests a total payment of
    $52,750.00, representing attorneys’ fees and costs for work performed by the law firm of
    Clifford J. Shoemaker.
    I find that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a reasonable basis
    for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems reasonable and appropriate.
    Accordingly, I hereby award the total $52,750.00 as a lump sum in the form of a check
    payable jointly to petitioners and petitioners’ counsel, Clifford J. Shoemaker.
    1
    The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq. (2006).
    In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review filed pursuant to Appendix B of the
    Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the clerk of the court shall enter judgment in
    accordance herewith.2
    IT IS SO ORDERED
    /s/ George L. Hastings, Jr.
    George L. Hastings, Jr.
    Special Master
    2
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing the
    right to seek review.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 98-618

Judges: George L. Hastings

Filed Date: 4/22/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/23/2015