Quintal v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •           In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 17-1360V
    Filed: June 5, 2019
    UNPUBLISHED
    AMBER QUINTAL,
    Petitioner,                         Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    v.                                                        Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Administration (SIRVA)
    Respondent.
    Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for
    petitioner.
    Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On September 27, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) following receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on April 12,
    2010. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office
    of Special Masters.
    On May 31, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that
    petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.
    1The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This
    means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine
    Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the
    disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned
    agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from
    public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this
    case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in
    accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management
    and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
    2   National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
    Specifically, respondent concluded that petitioner’s medical course is consistent with a
    SIRVA 
    Id. at 4-5.
    Respondent further agrees that petitioner has satisfied all legal
    prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. 
    Id. at 5.
    In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the
    undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-1360

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 8/21/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/22/2019