Beasley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •           In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 18-1130V
    Filed: June 5, 2019
    UNPUBLISHED
    ANGELA BEASLEY,
    Petitioner,                         Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    v.                                                        Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Tetanus Diphtheria acellular
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                          Administration (SIRVA)
    Milton Clay Ragsdale, IV, Ragsdale LLC, Birmingham, AL, for petitioner.
    Voris Edward Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On August 2, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
    Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine
    Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) following receipt of an influenza (“flu”) and a Tetanus
    Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) vaccination on October 3, 2016. Petition at 1. The
    case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On June 3, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that
    petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.
    Specifically, respondent concluded that petitioner suffered a right shoulder SIRVA
    1The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This
    means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine
    Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the
    disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned
    agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from
    public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this
    case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in
    accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management
    and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
    2   National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
    consistent with a Table Injury. 
    Id. at 10.
    Respondent further agrees that petitioner has
    satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. 
    Id. In view
    of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the
    undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-1130

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 8/21/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/22/2019