Xiangdong He and Bee Tan, as Parents and Legal Representatives of Enoch He, a Minor v. Secretary of Health and Human Services 0 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    No. 08-0207V
    Filed: December 20, 2013
    Not to be Published
    ****************************
    XIANGDONG HE and BEE TAN,               *
    as parents and legal representatives of *
    ENOCH HE, a minor,                      *
    *                Autism; Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
    Petitioners,        *
    *
    v.                         *
    *
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                 *
    HUMAN SERVICES                          *
    *
    Respondent.         *
    *
    ****************************
    DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1
    On December 20, 2013, the parties filed a Stipulation of Facts Concerning
    Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. After informal discussions, the parties have agreed on
    $11,837.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs. In lieu of filing a Vaccine General Order #9
    statement, petitioners’ counsel represents that petitioners personally incurred no costs
    that are compensable under § 15 (e)(1).
    The request for attorneys’ fees and costs is granted. Petitioners are
    awarded reasonable costs pursuant to §§ 15(b) and (e)(1), as I find that the filing of the
    petition was in good faith and upon a reasonable basis, and the amount requested is
    reasonable and appropriate.
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case,
    I intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in
    accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 
    116 Stat. 2899
    ,
    2913 (codified as amended at 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule
    18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information, that satisfies the
    criteria in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for
    redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material
    fits within the requirements of that provision, I will delete such material from public access.
    Pursuant to §15(e), I award a lump sum of $11,837.002 to be paid in the form
    of a check payable jointly to the petitioners and petitioners’ counsel, Sean
    Greenwood.
    In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review filed pursuant to Appendix B of
    the Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the Clerk of the court shall enter
    judgment in accordance herewith.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Denise K. Vowell
    Denise K. Vowell
    Chief Special Master
    2
    This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award
    encompasses all charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for
    legal services rendered. Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or
    collecting fees (including costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See
    generally Beck v. Sec’y of Dep't Health and Human Services, 
    924 F.2d 1029
     (Fed. Cir.1991).
    3
    Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to
    seek review. See Vaccine Rule 11(a).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-0207V

Judges: Special Master Vowell

Filed Date: 12/20/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021