Flynn v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 18-1675V
    UNPUBLISHED
    DEBORAH FLYNN,                                            Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                          Filed: December 11, 2019
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
    Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                           Administration (SIRVA)
    Phyllis Widman, Jacobs & Barbone, Atlantic City, NJ, for petitioner.
    Jeffrey T. Sprague, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
    On October 30, 2018, Deborah Flynn filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she sustained left shoulder injuries related to
    vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received on
    January 17, 2018. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit
    of the Office of Special Masters.
    On December 6, 2019, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he
    concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule
    4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent notes that “petitioner had no history of pain,
    1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to
    the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
    § 300aa (2012).
    inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder; pain occurred within 48 hours after the
    flu vaccine was administered; pain was limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was
    administered; and no other condition or abnormality has been identified to explain
    petitioner’s shoulder pain.” 
    Id. at 4.
    Respondent further agrees that “based on the
    medical records . . . petitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition for more
    than six months . . . . [and] has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under
    the Act.” 
    Id. In view
    of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
    Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-1675

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 1/14/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/14/2020