Aaronson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 18-1078V
    UNPUBLISHED
    MICHAL AARONSON,                                          Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                          Filed: December 27, 2019
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
    Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                           Administration (SIRVA)
    Shealene Priscilla Mancuso, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
    Colleen Clemons Hartley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
    On July 24, 2018, Michal Aaronson filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on
    October 6, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit
    of the Office of Special Masters.
    On December 23, 2019, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he
    concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule
    4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent concludes that “petitioner’s medical course is
    1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to
    the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    consistent with a [SIRVA] as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 4. Respondent
    further agrees that “petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation
    under the Act.” Id.
    In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
    Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-1078

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 1/27/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/27/2020