Ammerman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 18-1721V
    UNPUBLISHED
    KRISTEN AMMERMAN,                                         Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                          Filed: December 31, 2019
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
    Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                           Administration (SIRVA)
    Alison H. Haskins, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.
    Heather Lynn Pearlman, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1
    On November 6, 2018, Kristen Ammerman filed a petition for compensation
    under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et
    seq., 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related
    to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination
    administered on December 2, 2016. Petition at 3. The case was assigned to the
    Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On December 27, 2019, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he
    concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule
    4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent concluded that Petitioner’s claim meets the
    1
    Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to
    the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    Table criteria for a SIRVA and that she is entitled to a presumption of vaccine causation.
    Id. at 3.
    In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
    Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-1721

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 1/31/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/31/2020