Smith v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 19-266V
    UNPUBLISHED
    EARL J. SMITH,                                            Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                          Filed: June 2, 2020
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-
    Barre Syndrome (GBS)
    Respondent.
    Scott B. Taylor, Urban & Taylor, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for petitioner.
    Lisa Ann Watts, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
    On February 19, 2019, Earl J. Smith filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered from Guillain-Barre Syndrome
    (“GBS”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on June 15, 2009.
    Petition at 1 3. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of
    Special Masters.
    On May 19, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to
    compensation for GBS. On May 27, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award of
    compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $197,500.00 for past
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access
    to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    3
    Petitioner is not time-barred from alleging a Table injury of GBS because the petition was filed within the
    look-back provision. See § 16(b).
    and future pain and suffering. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that
    Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find
    that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $197,500.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This
    amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision. 4
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    4
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    EARL J. SMITH,
    Petitioner,
    v.                                           No. 19-266V
    Chief Special Master Corcoran
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                  ECF
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On February 19, 2019, Earl J. Smith (“petitioner”) filed a petition for vaccine injury
    compensation alleging that he developed Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”), a Table injury, as a
    result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to him on June 15, 2009. 1 Respondent filed his
    Rule 4(c) Report conceding entitlement to compensation on May 19, 2020, and the Court issued a
    Ruling on Entitlement that same day.
    I.         Items of Compensation
    Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
    a total of $197,500.00 for his past and future pain and suffering. This represents all elements of
    compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 2 Petitioner
    1
    Petitioner is not time-barred from alleging a Table injury of GBS under 42 U.S.C
    § 300aa–16(a)(2), because his petition was filed not later than two years after the effective date of
    the Table revision adding GBS as a Table injury following flu vaccine (March 21, 2017), and the
    alleged injury occurred not more than eight years prior to the effective date of the Table revision.
    See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa–16(b).
    2
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future damages.
    1
    agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
    through a lump sum payment of $197,500.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 3
    Petitioner agrees.
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOSEPH H. HUNT
    Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/Lisa A. Watts
    LISA A. WATTS
    Senior Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel.: (202) 616-4099
    DATED: May 27, 2020
    3
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Proof of guardianship is not required in this case.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-266

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 7/6/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/6/2020