McTernan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 19-0662V
    UNPUBLISHED
    SHANNON MCTERNAN,                                           Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                            Filed: June 11, 2020
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                            Administration (SIRVA)
    Bruce William Slane, Law Office of Bruce W. Slane, P.C., White Plains, NY, for
    petitioner.
    Catherine Elizabeth Stolar, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
    respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On May 3, 2019, Shannon McTernan filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) caused in fact by the influenza vaccine she received in her right
    arm on November 9, 2017. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 2, 27. Petitioner further alleged that she
    received the vaccination in the United States, suffered the residual effects of her SIRVA
    for more than six months, and that neither she nor any other party has filed a civil action
    or received compensation for her SIRVA, alleged as vaccine caused. Id. at ¶¶ 2, 29-31.
    The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
    Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the
    internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
    medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
    public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
    (2012).
    On March 27, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled
    to compensation for SIRVA. On June 11, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award of
    compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $51,405.73,
    representing compensation in the amount of $50,000.00 for her actual pain and suffering
    and $1,405.73 for her unreimburseable expenses. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer,
    Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on
    the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $51,405.73, representing compensation in the amount of
    $50,000.00 for her actual pain and suffering and $1,405.73 for her unreimburseable
    expenses in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents
    compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    )
    SHANNON MCTERNAN,                              )
    )
    Petitioner,                   )
    )       No. 19-662V
    v.                                   )       Chief Special Master Corcoran
    )       ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                        )
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                )
    )
    Respondent.                   )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On May 3, 2019, Shannon McTernan (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
    under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34
    (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a right shoulder injury as a result of an
    influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on November 9, 2017. On March 27, 2020, respondent
    filed a Rule 4(c) Report concluding that petitioner sustained an injury that is compensable under
    the Act, that is, a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the
    Vaccine Injury Table. See 
    42 C.F.R. § 100.3
    . The same day, the Chief Special Master issued a
    Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation.
    I.        Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items
    A.     Pain and Suffering
    Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $50,000.00 in actual and projected
    pain and suffering, as provided under Section 300aa-15(a)(4) of the Vaccine Act. Petitioner
    agrees.
    B.      Unreimbursable Expenses
    Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded unreimbursable expenses in the
    amount of $1,405.73, as provided under Section 300aa-15(a)(1)(B) of the Vaccine Act.
    Petitioner agrees.
    These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled
    under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner be made through a lump
    sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the
    Court’s judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $51,405.73, in the form of a
    check payable to petitioner, Shannon McTernan.
    III.   Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
    Lump sum payable to petitioner, Shannon McTernan:                            $51,405.73
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOSEPH H. HUNT
    Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings
    and future pain and suffering.
    2
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    GABRIELLE M. FIELDING
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/ Catherine E. Stolar
    CATHERINE E. STOLAR
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel.: (202) 353-3299
    Fax: (202) 616-4310
    Email: catherine.stolar@usdoj.gov
    DATED: 6/11/20
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-662

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 7/14/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/14/2020