Skopak v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 19-12V
    UNPUBLISHED
    AMY SKOPAK,                                               Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                          Filed: June 16, 2020
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                           Administration (SIRVA)
    Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for
    petitioner.
    Traci R. Patton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On January 3, 2019, Amy Skopak filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on
    September 28, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing
    Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On March 6, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled
    to compensation for her SIRVA. On June 11, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on
    award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $69,286.35.
    Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the
    1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access
    to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to
    an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $69,286.35 (representing compensation in the amount of
    $67,500.00 for pain and suffering and $1,786.35 for past unreimbursable out of
    pocket medical expenses) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This
    amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    AMY SKOPAK,                   )
    )
    Petitioner,         )
    v.                            )                    No. 19-12V
    )                    Chief Special Master Corcoran
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN )                    SPU
    SERVICES,                     )                    ECF
    )
    Respondent.         )
    )
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On February 28, 2020, respondent filed a Vaccine Rule 4(c) report concluding that
    petitioner sustained an injury that is compensable under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury
    Act of 1986, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34, that is, a shoulder injury related to
    vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table. The Chief Special
    Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement on March 6, 2020, finding that petitioner was entitled to
    vaccine compensation for her right-sided shoulder injury.
    I.    Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items
    Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
    $69,286.35. The award is comprised of the following: $67,500.00 for pain and suffering and
    $1,786.35 for past unreimbursable out of pocket medical expenses. This amount represents all
    elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
    Petitioner agrees.
    II.    Form of the Award
    The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through
    a lump sum payment, and request that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s
    judgment award the following: $69,286.35, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 1
    Petitioner agrees.
    Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOSEPH H. HUNT
    Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    GABRIELLE M. FIELDING
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    s/ Traci R. Patton
    TRACI R. PATTON
    Senior Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146
    Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Telephone: (202) 353-1589
    Dated: June 11, 2020
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings
    and future pain and suffering.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-12

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 7/16/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/16/2020