Drayton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •      In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 17-1932V
    UNPUBLISHED
    DEANNA DRAYTON,                                           Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                          Filed: June 16, 2020,
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Stipulation on Damages; Influenza
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury
    Related to Vaccine Administration
    Respondent.                           (SIRVA)
    Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner.
    Camille Michelle Collett, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1
    On December 12, 2017, Deanna Drayton filed a filed a petition for compensation
    under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et
    seq., 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related
    to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine
    administered on November 14, 2016. Petition at 1; Stipulation, issued at June 16, 2020,
    ¶¶ 2, 4. Petitioner further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of this injury
    for more than six months. Stipulation at ¶ 4. “Respondent denies that [P]etitioner
    sustained a SIRVA Table injury, and further denies that the vaccine caused her alleged
    shoulder injury or any other injury or condition .” Stipulation at ¶ 6.
    Nevertheless, on June 16, 2020, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,
    stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access
    to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth
    therein.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following
    compensation:
    a. A lump sum of $6,289.54 in the form of a check payable jointly to
    Petitioner and
    DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
    c/o New York City Human Resources Administration
    Division of Liens and Recovery
    P.O. Box 414799
    Boston, MA 02241-4799
    Case Number: 869773
    Petitioner agrees to endorse this check to New York City Department of Social
    Services.
    b. A lump sum of $84,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.
    Stipulation at ¶ 8. These amounts represent compensation for all items of
    damages that would be available under § 15(a). Id.
    I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of
    a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed
    to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    DEANNA DRAYTON,
    Petitioner,
    v.                                                     No. l7-1932V
    Chief Special Master Brian Corcoran
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                ECf
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    STIPULATION
    The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:
    I. Petitioner filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury
    Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the ·'Vaccine Program·'). The petition
    seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt of the influenza ("flu'")
    vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine rnjury Table (the '·Table..), 42 C.F.R. §
    I 00.3(a).
    2. Petitioner received the flu vaccination on or about November 14, 2016.
    3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.
    4. Petitioner alleges that following receipt of the flu vaccine she developed a left
    shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("STRVA.'), as defined in the Table, and further
    alleges that she experienced the residual effects of this alleged injury for more than six months.
    5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action
    for damages as a result of her condition.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-1932

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 7/16/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/16/2020