Caven v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •     In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 18-1506V
    UNPUBLISHED
    KELLY CAVEN,                                             Chief Special Master Corcoran
    Petitioner,                          Filed: June 24, 2020
    v.
    Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                  Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                          Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
    Injury Related to Vaccine
    Respondent.                          Administration (SIRVA)
    Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
    Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
    On September 28, 2018, Kelly Caven filed a petition for compensation under the
    National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
    “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that that she suffered left shoulder injuries related to
    vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination received
    on October 10, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing
    Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On March 11, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled
    to compensation for SIRVA. On June 23, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award of
    compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $125,000.00. Proffer
    at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered
    1
    Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to
    the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    2
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for ease
    of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
    (2012).
    award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award
    as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
    sum payment of $125,000.00, for pain and suffering, in the form of a check
    payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that
    would be available under § 15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    2
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    KELLY CAVEN,
    Petitioner,
    No. 18-1506v
    v.                                              Chief Special Master Corcoran (SPU)
    ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,
    Respondent.
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    I.        Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items
    On March 9, 2020, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report conceding that petitioner is
    entitled to vaccine compensation for a Table injury of Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
    Administration suffered following receipt of an influenza vaccination on October 10, 2016. A
    Ruling on Entitlement was issued on March 11, 2020.
    Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
    $125,000.00 for pain and suffering. This award represents all elements of compensation to
    which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 1 Petitioner agrees.
    II.       Form of the Award
    Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
    through a lump sum payment of $125,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 2
    Petitioner agrees.
    1
    Should Petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
    for appropriate relief.
    2
    Petitioner is a competent adult, therefore evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
    1
    Respectfully submitted,
    JOSEPH H. HUNT
    Assistant Attorney General
    C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
    Acting Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    CATHARINE E. REEVES
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    DARRYL WISHARD
    Assistant Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/ Adriana Teitel
    ADRIANA TEITEL
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, DC 20044-0146
    Tel: (202) 616-3677
    Dated: June 23, 2020
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-1506

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 7/27/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/28/2020