Dipiazza v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •           In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 20-349V
    ****************************
    JULIA DIPIAZZA,             *                               Chief Special Master Corcoran
    *
    Petitioner, *                               Filed: April 3, 2020
    *
    v.                          *                               Vaccine Rule 21(a); No Judgment;
    *                               Order Concluding Proceedings; Motion
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH         *                               To Voluntarily Dismiss
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,         *
    *
    Respondent. *
    *
    ****************************
    ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1
    On March 31, 2020, Petitioner filed a Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss pursuant to
    Vaccine Rule 21(a) in the above-captioned case. In support of this Motion, Petitioner
    states that the petition was filed in error as a duplicate. The Vaccine Act states that
    “[o]nly one petition may be filed with respect to each administration of a vaccine.” 42
    U.S.C. §300aa-11(b)(2). Thus, Petitioner’s motion is GRANTED.
    Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the above-captioned case is hereby
    dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a
    judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Chief Special Master
    1
    Because this unpublished Order contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
    required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002. 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
    Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available to anyone with access to
    the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
    redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
    privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
    material from public access.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20-349

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 5/4/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 5/5/2020