Long v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •          In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 17-209V
    (not to be published)
    ************************* *
    *
    PETER LONG III, Personal Representative *
    *
    of the Estate of Peter Long Jr.,        *             Filed: March 24, 2020
    *
    Petitioner,     *
    *
    *             Decision by Stipulation; Damages;
    v.                                      *             Influenza Vaccine; Guillain-Barré
    *             Syndrome (“GBS”).
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                 *
    HUMAN SERVICES,                         *
    *
    *
    Respondent.     *
    *
    ************************* *
    Howard Gold, Gold Law Firm, LLC, Wellesley Hills, MA, for Petitioner.
    Adriana Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1
    On February 13, 2017, Peter Long Jr. (“PLJ”) filed a petition, seeking compensation under
    the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Vaccine Program”).2 Pet., ECF No. 1.
    Peter Long III (“Petitioner”) became the Personal Representative of PLJ’s estate on December 4,
    2017. See Ex. 14. I issued an order to change the case caption on March 19, 2018. ECF No. 30.
    Petitioner alleges PLJ developed Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of the influenza
    vaccination PLJ received on October 27, 2015. See Stipulation ¶ 2, 4, dated March 24, 2020 (ECF
    1
    Although this Decision has been formally designated “not to be published,” it will nevertheless be posted
    on the Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     (2012). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. As provided
    by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain
    kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days
    within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or
    commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or
    similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine
    Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the Decision in its present form will be available. Id.
    2
    The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood
    Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    , codified as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. ' 300aa-
    10-' 300aa-34 (West 1991 & Supp. 2002). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine
    Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. ' 300aa.
    No. 56); see also Petition. Petitioner also alleges that PLJ’s GBS contributed to his death.
    Stipulation ¶ 4.
    Respondent denies “that the flu vaccine caused PLJ’s alleged GBS, any other injury, or his
    death.” See Stipulation ¶ 6. Nonetheless, both parties, while maintaining their above-stated
    positions, agreed in a stipulation filed March 24, 2020 that the issues before them can be settled
    and that a decision should be entered awarding Petitioner compensation.
    I have reviewed the file, and based upon that review, I conclude that the parties’ stipulation
    is reasonable. I therefore adopt it as my decision in awarding damages on the terms set forth
    therein.
    The stipulation awards:
    a lump sum of $225,000.00 in the form of a check payable to [P]etitioner as the personal
    representative of the estate of Peter Long Jr.
    Stipulation ¶ 8. This award represents compensation for all damages that would be available under
    42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
    I approve a Vaccine Program award in the requested amount set forth above to be made to
    Petitioner. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk
    of the Court is directed to enter judgment herewith.3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/ Katherine E. Oler
    Katherine E. Oler
    Special Master
    3
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by jointly filing notice
    renouncing their right to seek review.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-209

Judges: Katherine E. Oler

Filed Date: 5/13/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 5/13/2020