Hood v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •               In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 13-748V
    (Not to be published)
    *************************
    *
    GREGORY HOOD,               *
    *                        Filed: June 5, 2014
    Petitioner, *
    *                        Decision by Stipulation; Attorneys’
    v.                *                        Fees & Costs
    *
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND     *
    HUMAN SERVICES,             *
    *
    Respondent. *
    *
    *************************
    Christopher J. Maley, Maley and Maley, PLLC, Burlington, VT, for Petitioner
    Heather Pearlman, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent
    ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS DECISION 1
    On September 27, 2013, Petitioner Gregory Hood filed a petition seeking compensation
    under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. On May 23, 2014, the parties filed a
    stipulation detailing an amount to be awarded to Petitioner. That same day, I issued a decision
    finding the parties’ stipulation to be reasonable and granting Petitioner the award outlined by the
    stipulation.
    1
    Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for my action in this case, I will post this
    decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-
    Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as
    amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by 42 U.S.C § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B),
    however, the parties may object to the published decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of
    confidential information. To do so, Vaccine Rule 18(b) permit each party 14 days within which
    to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or
    commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes
    medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted
    invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the decision will be available to the
    public. 
    Id. On June
    5, 2014, counsel for both parties filed another joint stipulation, this time
    regarding attorneys’ fees and costs. The parties have stipulated that Petitioner’s counsel should
    receive a lump sum of $18,586.81 in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and
    Petitioner’s counsel. This amount represents a sum to which Respondent does not object. In
    accordance with General Order #9, the stipulation also includes a statement that Petitioner
    incurred no reimbursable costs in pursuit of his claim.
    I approve the requested amount for attorneys’ fees and costs as reasonable. Accordingly,
    an award should be made in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s
    counsel, Christopher J. Maley, Esq., in the amount of $18,586.81. In the absence of a motion for
    review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER
    JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. 2
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    /s/ Brian H. Corcoran
    Brian H. Corcoran
    Special Master
    2
    Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing (jointly or
    separately) notices renouncing their right to seek review.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:13-vv-00748

Judges: Brian H. Corcoran

Filed Date: 6/24/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021