Arriba Corporation and PMA Management Corporation v. Charles v. Hamilton ( 2007 )

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Frank, McClanahan and Senior Judge Willis ARRIBA CORPORATION AND PMA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 3048-06-2 PER CURIAM APRIL 17, 2007 CHARLES V. HAMILTON FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Kevin W. Cloe; Angela F. Gibbs; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C., on brief), for appellants. (Ralph Rabinowitz; Rabinowitz, Swartz, Taliaferro, Swartz & Goodove, P.C., on brief), for appellee. Arriba Corporation appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that it failed to prove that Charles V. Hamilton was fully capable of returning to his pre-injury work on November 28, 2005. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Hamilton v. Arriba Corp., VWC File No. 214-89-29 (Nov. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.