Roanoke County v. Mason Walter Ferris ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                     COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present:   Judges Baker, Elder and Fitzpatrick
    ROANOKE COUNTY
    AND
    CONSOLIDATED RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICE, INC.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION *
    v.   Record No. 0781-95-3                         PER CURIAM
    JANUARY 11, 1996
    MASON WALTER FERRIS
    FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION
    (Gregory P. Cochran; Caskie & Frost, on brief), for
    appellants.
    (Gary L. Lumsden; Rhonda L. Overstreet, on brief), for
    appellee.
    Roanoke County and its insurer (hereinafter collectively
    referred to as "employer") contend that the Workers' Compensation
    Commission erred in finding that the applicable two-year statute
    of limitations contained in Code § 65.2-601 did not bar the
    commission from awarding compensation to Mason Walter Ferris.
    Specifically, employer contends that (1) because it filed a
    "Report of Minor Injuries," claimant was not prejudiced by its
    failure to file the Employer's First Report of Accident; and (2)
    even without considering the Report of Minor Injuries, claimant
    was not prejudiced by employer's failure to file the Employer's
    First Report of Accident.   Upon reviewing the record and the
    briefs of the parties we conclude that this appeal is without
    merit.   Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's
    *
    Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
    designated for publication.
    decision.   Rule 5A:27.
    I.    Report of Minor Injuries
    Any theory of recovery or argument not raised before the
    commission will not be considered by this Court for the first
    time on appeal.   Rule 5A:18.    See also Kendrick v. Nationwide
    Homes, Inc., 
    4 Va. App. 189
    , 192, 
    355 S.E.2d 347
    , 349 (1987).
    Employer did not raise the issue of how its filing of the Report
    of Minor Injuries impacted upon the prejudice suffered by
    claimant.   Accordingly, we will not consider this argument on
    appeal.
    II.   Prejudice to Claimant Caused by Employer's Failure to Timely
    File the Employer's First Report of Accident
    On appeal, we review the evidence in the light most
    favorable to the prevailing party below.       R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp.
    v. Mullins, 
    10 Va. App. 211
    , 212, 
    390 S.E.2d 788
    , 788 (1990).
    The parties stipulated that claimant sustained a compensable
    injury by accident on January 24, 1992 resulting in left leg and
    knee injuries.    On the date of the accident, claimant sought
    medical treatment from Dr. Curtis S. Mull, who diagnosed a torn
    medial meniscus related to his January 24, 1992 injury by
    accident.   On April 6, 1992, Dr. Mull noted that claimant's knee
    was doing well, but that he might need surgery in the future.
    Dr. Mull discharged claimant from his care on that date and he
    returned to his pre-injury work.       Between April 7, 1992 and April
    27, 1994, claimant did not seek medical treatment for his left
    2
    knee, except to obtain a new knee brace.    On April 27, 1994,
    claimant returned to Dr. Mull complaining that his knee was
    locking.    Dr. Mull recommended that claimant undergo an
    arthroscopy and a partial meniscectomy on his left knee.    Dr.
    Mull related this surgery to the January 24, 1992 injury by
    accident.
    Claimant filed a claim for benefits on July 20, 1994, more
    than two years after the January 24, 1992 injury by accident.      On
    August 10, 1994, employer filed the Employer's First Report of
    Accident.   Claimant testified that he never received the notice
    set forth in Code § 65.2-602.
    Pursuant to Code § 65.2-602, the two-year statute of
    limitations is tolled where employer received notice of the
    accident, employer failed to file an Employer's First Report of
    Accident, and employer's conduct prejudiced the employee's right
    with respect to filing a timely claim.     Bristol Newspapers, Inc.
    v. Shaffer, 
    16 Va. App. 703
    , 706-07, 
    432 S.E.2d 23
    , 25 (1993). 1
    Here, employer did not dispute that it received notice of
    claimant's accident when it occurred, and that it did not file an
    1
    This case is distinguishable from Bristol Newspapers. In
    Bristol Newspapers, unlike this case, employer filed the
    Employer's First Report of Accident three months after the
    employee's industrial accident and the employee received the
    "blue letter" and "employee's guide" from the commission. 16 Va.
    App. at 707, 432 S.E.2d at 25. Moreover, Hervey v. Newport News
    Shipbuilding & Drydock Co., 
    12 Va. App. 88
    , 
    402 S.E.2d 688
    (1991), cited by employer, was decided under former Code
    § 65.1-87.1, before the General Assembly added the provisions
    pertaining to the failure to file an Employer's First Report of
    Accident to present Code § 65.2-602.
    3
    Employer's First Report of Accident until August 10, 1994, after
    the expiration of the two-year statute of limitations.    Employer
    presented no evidence to show that claimant received notice from
    the commission concerning his right to file a claim prior to the
    expiration of the limitations period.   Therefore, under these
    facts, the commission did not err in finding that employer's
    conduct prejudiced claimant from filing a timely claim.
    For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision.
    Affirmed.
    4