-
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judges Benton and Coleman MARY WASHINGTON HEALTH CENTER AND THE RECIPROCAL GROUP MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 0959-99-2 PER CURIAM SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 IRIS N. JONES FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (John E. McIntosh, Jr.; Crews & Hancock, P.L.C., on briefs), for appellants. (Wesley G. Marshall, on brief), for appellee. Mary Washington Health Center and its insurer (hereinafter referred to as "employer") contend that the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in awarding Iris N. Jones temporary total disability benefits beginning January 1, 1997, fourteen months before Jones filed her February 28, 1998 change-in-condition application requesting a resumption of temporary total disability benefits beginning February 16, 1998. Specifically, employer asserts that the full commission's award on review (1) violated employer's due process rights; (2) violated Rule 1.2B, Rules of the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission; and (3) was not supported by medical evidence establishing causally-related disability for the period from * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code § 17-116.010, this opinion is not designated for publication. January 1, 1997 through February 16, 1998. Upon reviewing the records and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. See Rule 5A:27. The record does not indicate that employer ever informed the full commission of its objections to the commission's decision on these grounds. By virtue of employer's timely appeal to this Court, the record establishes that employer received a copy of the commission's March 26, 1999 decision and that the decision clearly indicated that the commission was awarding Jones benefits beginning January 1, 1997, even though Jones' application had only requested benefits beginning February 16, 1998. The record does not show that employer ever filed a motion to reconsider or set aside the full commission's decision. Because employer did not raise these arguments before the commission, we cannot consider them for the first time on appeal. See Rule 5A:18; Green v. Warwick Plumbing & Heating Corp.,
5 Va. App. 409, 412-13,
364 S.E.2d 4, 6 (1998). Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision. Affirmed. - 2 -
Document Info
Docket Number: 0959992
Filed Date: 9/21/1999
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/30/2014