Deborah Lynn Cooper v. BB&T Corporation and Hartford Casualty Insurance Company ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                                COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present: Judges Kelsey, Petty and Senior Judge Bumgardner
    DEBORAH LYNN COOPER
    MEMORANDUM OPINION*
    v.     Record No. 1083-07-4                                          PER CURIAM
    SEPTEMBER 4, 2007
    BB&T CORPORATION AND
    HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
    FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
    (Jonathan S. Rochkind; Smith, Hudson & Carluzzo, P.C., on brief),
    for appellant.
    (Daniel E. Lynch; John T. Cornett, Jr.; Williams & Lynch, on brief),
    for appellees.
    Deborah Lynn Cooper (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation
    Commission finding that she failed to prove she sustained an injury by accident arising out of her
    employment on October 10, 2005. Claimant also asserts the commission erred when it failed to
    address the deputy commissioner’s findings as to claimant’s credibility.
    With respect to the first question, we have reviewed the record and the commission’s
    opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
    by the commission in its final opinion. See Cooper v. BB&T Corporation, VWC File
    No. 227-08-53 (April 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
    *
    Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
    With respect to the second question, claimant failed to file a motion for reconsideration
    or rehearing after the commission issued its April 3, 2007 review opinion in order to present the
    commission with the argument she now makes on appeal. Thus, Rule 5A:18 bars our
    consideration of this issue because claimant did not provide the commission with the opportunity
    to correct any perceived error. In these circumstances, we will not consider this argument for the
    first time on appeal. See Williams v. Gloucester Sheriff’s Dep’t, 
    266 Va. 409
    , 411, 
    587 S.E.2d 546
    , 548 (2003).
    Affirmed.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1083074

Filed Date: 9/4/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014