David Hanscom v. Advance Auto Parts and Royal Insurance Company of America ( 2005 )

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judge McClanahan, Senior Judges Coleman and Annunziata DAVID HANSCOM MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 1321-05-1 PER CURIAM NOVEMBER 29, 2005 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS AND ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (David Hanscom, pro se, on brief). (Robert A. Rapaport; Jennifer Tatum Atkinson; Clarke, Dolph, Rapaport, Hardy & Hull, P.L.C., on brief), for appellees. David Hanscom appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that (1) he failed to prove he remained partially disabled after June 13, 2002, as a result of his compensable injury by accident; and (2) he was not entitled to a change in treating physicians. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Hanscom v. Advance Auto Parts, VWC File No. 202-41-09 (May 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed. * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.