Charles J. Perry v. Commonwealth ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                        COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judge Coleman and Senior Judge Cole
    Argued at Richmond, Virginia
    CHARLES J. PERRY
    MEMORANDUM OPINION *
    v.          Record No. 0237-95-2         BY JUDGE MARVIN F. COLE
    JULY 9, 1996
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
    FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
    William R. Shelton, Judge
    John J. Trexler (Beddow, Marley, Burgess &
    Associates, on brief), for appellant.
    Eugene Murphy, Assistant Attorney General
    (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on
    brief), for appellee.
    On appeal from his convictions of robbery, abduction and
    assault, Charles J. Perry contends that the evidence was
    insufficient to sustain the convictions.       We disagree and affirm
    the trial court.
    In November, 1993, Larry Bonner, the victim, was arrested
    and incarcerated in Petersburg.       He was released on bond, with
    Perry acting as his bondsman.       Earl Fields co-signed as a
    guarantor on Bonner's bond.        Bonner agreed to pay Perry's fee in
    bi-weekly installments, which he failed to do on a regular basis.
    On April 30, 1994, Bonner still owed Perry money on the
    bond.       Fields saw Bonner at a nightclub in Petersburg and asked
    *
    Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
    designated for publication.
    Bonner whether he had any money.    Bonner responded that he did
    not.    After calling Perry, Fields handcuffed Bonner and
    transported him to Perry's house.
    Bonner testified that when he arrived at Perry's house,
    Perry struck him in the face several times and asked whether he
    had any money.    Then, Perry and Fields both struck and kicked
    Bonner.    Bonner testified, "Fields took my gold tooth out with
    the pliers.    Perry busted my eardrum, with his hands . . . ."
    The gold "tooth" was a gold crown that was removed from Bonner's
    front tooth.
    Bonner stated he was then handcuffed to Perry's garage door
    from about 1:30 a.m. until 8:00 a.m., when Fields took Bonner to
    the Petersburg jail.
    Bonner testified that, as a result of the incident, his eyes
    were swollen, the skin was broken on his wrists from the
    handcuffs, his ribs were sore, and his nose was bleeding.       He
    also said they "messed [his] teeth up."      Henry Stewart, a
    doctor's assistant at the jail, testified that, when Bonner
    arrived at the jail, he had abrasions and swelling below both
    eyes.    He had a red mark around both wrists, and one hand was
    swollen.    Stewart said Bonner complained of tenderness on his
    right side, soreness in his neck, and a swollen left cheek.
    Perry testified that he instructed Fields to bring Bonner to
    his house on April 30, 1994, and that, when they arrived,
    Bonner's eyes were puffy and red.       Perry said he could not return
    -2-
    Bonner to jail without a bailpiece, and the bailpiece forms were
    -3-
    at his office and at his house.     He denied he abused Bonner and
    said he did not see Fields abuse Bonner.     Perry denied Bonner was
    handcuffed to a doorknob, stating that he has no garage or tool
    shed.    Perry testified that the sergeant at the Petersburg jail
    told him not to bring Bonner in until after 7:30 a.m. because the
    jail was busy.
    I.   Robbery
    "On appeal, we review the evidence in the light most
    favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable
    inferences fairly deducible therefrom."      Martin v. Commonwealth,
    
    4 Va. App. 438
    , 443, 
    358 S.E.2d 415
    , 418 (1987).     The elements of
    robbery are "[1] the taking, with the intent to steal, [2] of the
    personal property of another, [3] from his person or in his
    presence, [4] against his will, by violence or intimidation."
    Jordan v. Commonwealth, 
    2 Va. App. 590
    , 595, 
    347 S.E.2d 152
    , 155
    (1986).
    A principal in the second degree is a
    person who is present, aiding and abetting,
    by helping some way in the commission of the
    crime. Presence or consent alone is not
    sufficient to constitute aiding and abetting.
    It must be shown that the defendant intended
    his words, gestures, signals or actions to in
    some way encourage, advise, or urge, or in
    some way help the person committing the crime
    to commit it.
    Ramsey v. Commonwealth, 
    2 Va. App. 265
    , 269, 
    343 S.E.2d 465
    , 468
    (1986).
    Perry instructed Fields to bring Bonner to Perry's house on
    April 30, 1994.    Bonner arrived at Perry's house in handcuffs.
    -4-
    Bonner testified that, upon his arrival, Perry struck him in the
    face several times and asked if he had any money.    Bonner stated
    that both Perry and Fields beat and kicked him, and that Perry
    "busted his eardrum with his hands."    Bonner also testified that
    "Fields took my gold tooth out with the pliers."
    Although Perry testified that he did not harm or abuse
    appellant, the fact finder believed the testimony of Bonner.
    "The weight which should be given to evidence and whether the
    testimony of a witness is credible are questions which the fact
    finder must decide."   Bridgeman v. Commonwealth, 
    3 Va. App. 523
    ,
    528, 
    351 S.E.2d 598
    , 601 (1986).    Bonner's testimony was
    competent and was not inherently incredible.    From his testimony,
    the fact finder could have inferred beyond a reasonable doubt
    that Fields extracted the gold crown in the quest to obtain
    something of monetary value from Bonner.    The fact finder could
    also have inferred beyond a reasonable doubt that Perry intended
    his actions of beating and kicking Bonner to aid and encourage
    Fields in removing the gold crown because it was removed during
    the joint attack on Bonner.
    Moreover, the fact finder could have concluded that Fields
    and Perry were acting in concert to obtain something of value
    from Bonner.   As such, Perry is deemed to have shared Fields'
    intent and is criminally responsible for Fields' acts as a
    principal in the second degree.     See Riddick v. Commonwealth, 
    226 Va. 244
    , 248, 
    308 S.E.2d 117
    , 119 (1983).    Accordingly, Perry is
    -5-
    equally responsible for Fields' removal of the gold crown.
    The evidence also supports a finding that the taking was
    effected through the use of violence or intimidation.   From the
    evidence of the beating of the handcuffed victim, and the use of
    pliers to remove the gold crown from Bonner's mouth, the fact
    finder could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the
    beating and the theft of the crown were "interdependent objects
    of a common criminal design" to obtain something of monetary
    value from Bonner.   See Yeatts v. Commonwealth, 
    242 Va. 121
    , 138,
    
    410 S.E.2d 254
    , 265 (1991), cert. denied, 
    503 U.S. 946
    (1992).
    Thus, the violence and intimidation, through both the beating and
    the forceful extraction of the gold crown, preceded or was
    concomitant with the taking.    Therefore, the evidence was
    sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Perry
    committed robbery.
    II.   Abduction
    The evidence proved that Fields handcuffed Bonner while he
    was in the nightclub, then transported him to Perry's house,
    where he was beaten and handcuffed to the garage door for over
    six hours before he was taken to jail.
    Code § 18.2-47 provides, in part:
    Any person, who, by force, intimidation or
    deception, and without legal justification or
    excuse, seizes, takes, transports, detains,
    or secretes the person of another, with the
    intent to deprive such other person of his
    personal liberty or to withhold or conceal
    him from any person, authority or institution
    lawfully entitled to his charge, shall be
    deemed guilty of "abduction."
    -6-
    Nothing in Code § 19.2-149 1 imparted legal justification to
    beat Bonner and handcuff him for six hours to a door before
    surrendering him to jail.   Although Perry denied that he abused
    Bonner or handcuffed him to a door, the fact finder believed
    Bonner's testimony.   See 
    Bridgeman, 3 Va. App. at 528
    , 351 S.E.2d
    at 601.   From this evidence, the fact finder could have found
    beyond a reasonable doubt that Perry detained Bonner, by force,
    without legal justification, and with the intent to deprive him
    of his personal liberty.    Thus, the evidence was sufficient to
    prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Perry committed abduction.
    III.    Assault
    "Criminal assault . . . is 'any attempt or offer with force
    or violence to do corporal hurt to another.'"      Martin v.
    Commonwealth, 
    13 Va. App. 524
    , 527, 
    414 S.E.2d 401
    , 402 (1992)
    (en banc) (citation omitted).      Bonner stated that Perry struck
    him, kicked him, and "busted [his] eardrum with his hands."
    Bonner also testified that, as a result of the conduct of Perry
    and Fields, his eyes were swollen, his ribs were sore, his nose
    bled, and his teeth were "messed up."     Henry Stewart's testimony
    corroborated Bonner's testimony concerning Bonner's wounds.
    1
    Code § 19.2-149 provides, in pertinent part: "A surety on
    a bond in a recognizance may at any time arrest his principal and
    surrender him to the court before which the recognizance was
    taken or before which such principal's appearance is required, or
    to the sheriff, sergeant or jailer of the county or city wherein
    the court before which such principal's appearance is required is
    located . . . ."
    -7-
    Although Perry testified that Bonner was injured before he
    arrived at Perry's house, the fact finder believed the testimony
    of Bonner concerning the beating.     See 
    Bridgeman, 3 Va. App. at 528
    , 351 S.E.2d at 601.   From this evidence, the fact finder
    could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Perry was guilty
    of assault.
    For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the trial court
    is affirmed.
    Affirmed.
    -8-