Bell v. Secretary of Health and Human Services ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •         In the United States Court of Federal Claims
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    No. 15-444V
    Filed: November 20, 2015
    Unpublished
    ****************************
    ELIZABETH S. BELL,                    *
    *
    Petitioner,         *     Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    *     Influenza;
    *     Shoulder Injury (“SIRVA”);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH                   *     Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,                   *
    *
    Respondent.         *
    *
    ****************************
    Glenn Edwards Bowens, Bowens Law Firm, Winnsboro, SC, for petitioner.
    Douglass Ross, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
    DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1
    Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
    On May 1, 2015, Petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
    Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 [the “Vaccine
    Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury as a result of a
    September 14, 2010 influenza vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to
    the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
    On September 11, 2015, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner
    entitled to compensation for a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
    (“SIRVA”). On November 20, 2015, respondent filed a proffer on award of
    compensation [“Proffer”] indicating petitioner should be awarded $55,000.00. Proffer at
    1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered
    1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
    undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
    the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 
    116 Stat. 2899
    , 2913 (codified as amended
    at 
    44 U.S.C. § 3501
     note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
    identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
    unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
    within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
    2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 
    100 Stat. 3755
    . Hereinafter, for
    ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
    300aa (2012).
    award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled
    to an award as stated in the Proffer.
    Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
    petitioner a lump sum payment of $55,000.00 in the form of a check payable to
    petitioner, Elizabeth S. Bell. This amount represents compensation for all damages
    that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).
    The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
    decision. 3
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    s/Nora Beth Dorsey
    Nora Beth Dorsey
    Chief Special Master
    3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
    renouncing the right to seek review.
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
    ************************** * *
    *
    ELIZABETH S. BELL,            *
    *
    Petitioner,   *
    *
    v.                            *                              No. 15-444V (ECF)
    *                               CHIEF SPECIAL MASTER
    *                              NORA BETH DORSEY
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH           *
    AND HUMAN SERVICES,           *
    *
    Respondent.   *
    *****************************
    RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
    On September 11, 2015, the Chief Special Master found that a preponderance of the
    medical evidence indicates that petitioner suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
    administration (“SIRVA”), which was causally related to the flu vaccination she received on
    September 14, 2010. The parties proceeded thereafter to address the amount of compensation to
    be awarded in this case.
    I.     Items of Compensation
    Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
    a total lump sum of $55,000.00, which amount represents all elements of compensation to which
    petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 1 Petitioner agrees.
    1
    Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, respondent would oppose any award for future
    medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering, and the parties reserve the
    right to move the Court for appropriate relief.
    II.    Form of the Award
    The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
    through a lump sum payment of $55,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
    Petitioner agrees.
    Respectfully submitted,
    BENJAMIN C. MIZER
    Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
    RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
    Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    VINCENT J. MATANOSKI
    Deputy Director
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    LINDA S. RENZI
    Senior Trial Counsel
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    /s/ DOUGLAS ROSS
    DOUGLAS ROSS
    Trial Attorney
    Torts Branch, Civil Division
    U.S. Department of Justice
    P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station
    Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
    Tel.: (202) 616-3667
    DATE: November 20, 2015
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-444

Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey

Filed Date: 3/23/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021