State v. Murrill , 2017 Ohio 7120 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Murrill, 
    2017-Ohio-7120
    .]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
    BUTLER COUNTY
    STATE OF OHIO,                                      :
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                         :      CASE NO. CA2017-01-007
    :             DECISION
    - vs -                                                          8/7/2017
    :
    ROBERT MURRILL,                                     :
    Defendant-Appellant.                        :
    CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
    Case No. CR2012-12-1936
    Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315
    High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for plaintiff-appellee
    Christopher Paul Frederick, 300 High Street, Suite 550, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for defendant-
    appellant
    Per Curiam.
    {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of
    the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the
    Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel.
    {¶ 2} Counsel for appellant, Robert Murrill, has filed a brief with this court pursuant to
    Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 
    87 S.Ct. 1396
     (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful
    Butler CA2017-01-007
    review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court
    prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;
    (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 
    87 S.Ct. at 1400
    ; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the
    proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's
    constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the
    basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and
    motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.
    {¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having
    been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to
    appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant
    requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that
    it is wholly frivolous.
    S. POWELL, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CA2017-01-007

Citation Numbers: 2017 Ohio 7120

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 8/7/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/7/2017