benny-p-phillips-md-v-dale-bramlett-individually-and-as-independent ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                                       NO. 07-07-0166-CR
    NO. 07-07-0167-CR
    NO. 07-07-0168-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    AT AMARILLO
    PANEL B
    JUNE 4, 2007
    ______________________________
    ELLIS BUTLER,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    _________________________________
    FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
    NOS. 49,819-C; 50,096-C; 50,097-C; HON. PATRICK A. PIRTLE, PRESIDING
    _______________________________
    Memorandum Opinions
    _______________________________
    Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
    Ellis Butler (appellant) appeals from the orders for withdrawal of funds from his
    inmate trust account to offset court costs assessed in his prior convictions. We dismiss the
    appeals for lack of jurisdiction.
    The record before us reveals that the “Order[s] for Withdrawal from Inmate
    Account. . .” were signed on April 8, 2005. Pursuant to the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure, appellant was required to file his motions for new trial or notices of appeal with
    the clerk of the trial court no later than 30 days after the signing of the orders, or by May
    9, 2005. The notices of appeals were filed on May 2, 2007. Because the deadline to
    perfect an appeal was May 9, 2005, the notices appeared untimely. TEX . R. APP. P. 26.2
    (stating that one must file a notice of appeal within 30 days of the date the final order is
    signed, unless that deadline has been extended by motion or rule of procedure).
    Furthermore, no motion (timely or otherwise) to extend the May 9th deadline was received
    by this court.
    By letter dated May 21, 2007, we directed appellant to explain why the notices of
    appeal were late or why he believed them to be timely. The explanation was due by May
    31, 2007. He was also told that the failure to comply with this directive would result in the
    dismissal of the appeals. To date, no response has been received.
    A timely notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. In re
    A.L.B., 
    56 S.W.3d 651
    , 652 (Tex. App.–Waco 2003, no pet.). If the notice is untimely, then
    the court of appeals can take no action other than to dismiss the proceeding. 
    Id. The notice
    at bar being untimely, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.
    Brian Quinn
    Chief Justice
    Do not publish.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-05-00456-CV

Filed Date: 6/4/2007

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/1/2016