Jonathan Austin Burkett v. Maria Chona Kalaw Kaibigan Burkett, etc. , 155 So. 3d 478 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                         IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
    JONATHAN AUSTIN BURKETT,
    NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
    Appellant,                        FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
    DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
    v.
    CASE NO. 1D14-1843
    MARIA CHONA KALAW
    KAIBIGAN BURKETT, n/k/a
    McCay,
    Appellee.
    _____________________________/
    Opinion filed January 20, 2015.
    An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
    Thomas R. Santurri, Judge.
    Sharon K. Wilson, Pensacola, for Appellant.
    Autumn O. Beck, Pensacola, for Appellee.
    PER CURIAM.
    The former husband appeals from an order awarding the former wife
    attorney’s fees for proceedings to modify a final judgment of dissolution of
    marriage, as well as an income deduction order effectuating the fee order. He has
    shown error in the trial court’s failure to include sufficient findings to support the
    fee award, but we are constrained to affirm as to this issue because the former
    husband did not file a motion for rehearing alerting the trial court to the
    deficiencies in the findings. See Owens v. Owens, 
    973 So. 2d 1169
    , 1170 (Fla. 1st
    DCA 2007); See Furr v. Furr, 
    57 So. 3d 914
    , 914 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). The former
    husband has also raised our suspicions concerning substantive error in the decision
    to award attorney’s fees, in the amount of attorney’s fees awarded, and in the
    inclusion of all the attorney’s fees in the income deduction order. However, we are
    again constrained to affirm because the former husband has represented that no
    transcript is available for the relevant hearing. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of
    Tallahassee, 
    377 So. 2d 1150
    , 1152 (Fla. 1979). Without a transcript, we cannot
    know what evidence the court heard beyond the documents that were filed in the
    record, and we cannot know what issues were preserved for review. See id.; Rose
    v. Clements, 
    73 So. 2d 529
    , 530 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Hoffman v. Hoffman, 
    920 So. 2d 131
    , 131 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).
    AFFIRMED.
    ROBERTS, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-1843

Citation Numbers: 155 So. 3d 478

Filed Date: 1/19/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023