Rubino v. Fowler ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • Rubino v. Fowler, No. 465-7-11 Rdcv (Teachout, J., Dec. 30, 2011)
    [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the
    accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.]
    STATE OF VERMONT
    SUPERIOR COURT                                                                                   CIVIL DIVISION
    Rutland Unit                                                                               Docket No. 465-7-11 Rdcv
    PETER RUBINO, et al.,
    Appellants
    v.
    JAMES T. FOWLER,
    Appellees
    ORDER
    A hearing was held in Small Claims Court in Docket 198-3-11 Rdsc on June 1,
    2011. The Court issued Judgment for James T. Fowler, Appellee. Appellants Peter N.
    and Patricia Rubino appealed on the grounds that they were in bankruptcy at the time of
    the hearing and permission had not been obtained from the Bankruptcy Court to pursue
    the claim against them. This Court issued an Entry Order on July 22, 2011, staying the
    proceedings and giving Mr. Fowler an opportunity to show that permission had been
    granted by the Bankruptcy Court to proceed with the case in Small Claims Court.
    Mr. Fowler has not filed anything showing such permission. The undersigned has
    listened to the full record of the hearing held on June 1, 2011. The undisputed evidence
    was that the Rubinos had an open bankruptcy case, and they argued that the case against
    them was prohibited by the bankruptcy stay. The Small Claims Judge acknowledged that
    bankruptcy stays “everything,” but nonetheless issued judgment.
    The automatic stay precludes proceeding with cases against persons who have
    filed for bankruptcy. 11 U.S.C.A. § 362. When a state court issues an order in violation
    of the stay, that order is invalid, absent the Bankruptcy Court’s retroactive approval of the
    order. See In re Soares, 
    107 F.3d 969
    (1st Cir. 1997); see also Dudley v. Dudley, 
    2011 WL 6117922
    (Ala. Civ. App. Dec. 9, 2011)(vacating divorce judgment issued in
    violation of automatic stay).
    The Small Claims Court Judgment of June 1, 2011 must be vacated, and the case
    dismissed. This case is remanded to the Small Claims Court for entries showing the
    judgment is vacated and the case dismissed due to the bankruptcy stay.
    Dated at Rutland this 29th day of December, 2011.
    ____________________________
    Hon. Mary Miles Teachout
    Superior Judge
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 465

Filed Date: 12/30/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021