-
I am not willing to concur in the majority opinion, at least until the effect of Rem. Comp. Stat., § 4706 (Laws of 1917, p. 332, § 1), is determined, and it is not discussed therein.
The Bruenn case,
101 Wn. 374 ,172 P. 569 , was under the law as it existed prior to § 4706. The Rice case,140 Wn. 189 ,248 P. 388 , simply followed the Bruenn case, supra, and the case of Stovall v. Toppenish School Dist. No. 49,110 Wn. 97 ,188 P. 12 , without distinction and without referring to § 4706.This is a most far-reaching decision in its future effect.
Without finally committing myself should the case be heard EnBanc, I dissent. *Page 127
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 22686. Department One.
Citation Numbers: 294 P. 998, 160 Wash. 121
Judges: MAIN, J.
Filed Date: 1/5/1931
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023