State Of Washington v. Larry Joe Berniard ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
    STATE OF WASHINGTON,
    No. 70357-9-1
    Respondent,
    DIVISION ONE
    v.
    UNPUBLISHED OPINION
    LARRY JOE BERNIARD,
    Appellant.                   FILED:   May 27, 2014
    Per Curiam. Larry Berniard appeals from his conviction for three counts of
    unlawful delivery of cocaine. Berniard's court-appointed attorney has filed a motion
    to withdraw on the ground that there is no basis for a good faith argument on review.
    Pursuant to State v. Theobald. 
    78 Wash. 2d 184
    , 
    470 P.2d 188
    (1970), and Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 
    18 L. Ed. 2d 493
    , 
    87 S. Ct. 1396
    (1967), the motion to
    withdraw must:
    [1] be accompanied by a brief referring to anything in the record that
    might arguably support the appeal. [2] A copy of counsel's brief should
    be furnished the indigent and [3] time allowed him to raise any points
    that he chooses; [4] the court-not counsel-then proceeds, after a full
    examination of all the proceedings, to decide whether the case is wholly
    frivolous.
    State v. 
    Theobald, 78 Wash. 2d at 185
    (quoting Anders v. 
    California, 386 U.S. at 744
    ).
    This procedure has been followed. Berniard's counsel on appeal filed a brief
    with the motion to withdraw. Berniard was served with a copy of the brief and
    informed of the right to file a statement of additional grounds for review. He did not
    file a statement of additional grounds.
    No. 70357-9-1/2
    The facts are accurately set forth in counsel's brief in support of the motion to
    withdraw. The court has reviewed the briefs filed in this court and has independently
    reviewed the entire record. The court specifically considered the following potential
    issues raised by counsel:
    1. Whether sufficient evidence supported Berniard's convictions for delivery of
    cocaine?
    2. Whether the trial court erred in failing to give Berniard's proposed
    reasonable doubt instruction?
    The potential issues are wholly frivolous. Counsel's motion to withdraw is
    granted and the appeal is dismissed.
    For the Court:
    ^.ckuR, '
    S       too
    —       r^cr
    3=»
    ni~'
    —<
    ~n '•-
    — ~> •
    ZS.     rr: J>
    CO       ~, U'i
    XT      o     ™
    co      -•-•"-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 70357-9

Filed Date: 5/27/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014