State of Washington v. Joseph Fitzgerald Mandoli ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                                                             FILED
    JUNE 16, 2016
    In the Office of the Clerk of Court
    WA State Court of Appeals, Division III
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
    DIVISION THREE
    STATE OF WASHINGTON,                           )
    )         No. 33524-1-111
    Respondent,               )
    )
    v.                                      )
    )
    JOSEPH FITZGERALD MANDOLI,                     )         UNPUBLISHED OPINION
    )
    Appellant.                )
    )
    SIDDOWAY, J. - Joseph Mandoli and a confederate stole two loads of copper
    from Alcoa, Inc. Mr. Mandoli pleaded guilty in Chelan County to second degree
    possession of stolen property. After a contested restitution hearing in May 2015, the trial
    court set the amount of restitution at $17,945. On appeal, Mr. Mandoli contends the trial
    court abused its discretion in determining the amount of copper he stole. We conclude
    that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in choosing a reasonable basis for
    estimating the amount of loss, but remand for correction of a calculation error.
    FACTS
    Between May 30, 2013, and October 14, 2013, Mr. Mandoli and Andrew
    Frederick, both Alcoa employees, stole two pickup truck loads of copper tabs and shunts
    from an Alcoa plant. Police arrested them as they were stealing a third load. The State
    No. 33524-1-III
    State v. Mandoli
    charged Mr. Mandoli with three counts of first degree theft and two counts of first degree
    trafficking in stolen property. After plea negotiations, Mr. Mandoli agreed to plead guilty
    to one count of second degree possession of stolen property that exceeded a value of
    $750.
    At the restitution hearing, Mr. Frederick testified that he sold all 3,023 pounds of
    one load of the copper for $2.28 per pound (a total of $6,892.00) and Mr. Mandoli sold
    810 pounds of the other load. Mr. Frederick did not know if Mr. Mandoli sold all of his
    load. Mr. Frederick estimated that the first two loads weighed about the same, but he
    thought the third load, which he and Mr. Mandoli were caught with, was about 30 to 40
    percent heavier. This third load weighed 3,895 pounds. An Alcoa employee estimated
    that the value of the copper tabs would be about $3 .11 per pound at auction. The shunts,
    which were worn but could be resurfaced for continued use, typically cost about $6.88
    per pound when new.
    The trial court accepted Mr. Frederick's estimate that the first two loads weighed
    30 to 40 percent less than the third load. Splitting the difference, the court concluded that
    each of the first two loads was 35 percent less than the third load, for a total of
    approximately 2,885 pounds per load. Doubled, the two loads were estimated to weigh
    5,770.00 pounds. The court then multiplied the total weight by the auction market value
    of $3.11 per pound, for a total restitution amount of $17,945.00.
    2
    No. 33524-1-III
    State v. Mandoli
    ANALYSIS
    Mr. Mandoli does not assign error to the trial court's valuation of the copper at
    $3 .11 per pound. What he challenges is the weight of the stolen loads. He contends the
    evidence shows that only one load of 3,023 pounds and one load of 810 pounds (a total of
    3,833 pounds) were stolen and sold.
    By Washington statute, a court must order restitution whenever a defendant is
    convicted of an offense that causes loss of property. RCW 9.94A.753(5); State v.
    Griffith, 
    164 Wash. 2d 960
    , 965, 
    195 P.3d 506
    (2008). The amount of restitution must be
    based on easily ascertainable damages, but need not be established with specific
    accuracy. 
    Griffith, 164 Wash. 2d at 965
    . In a contested restitution hearing, the claimed loss
    must be supported by substantial credible evidence. 
    Id. This evidence
    is sufficient if it
    provides a reasonable basis for estimating the loss and does not constitute mere
    speculation. 
    Id. We review
    the trial court's restitution award for abuse of discretion. 
    Id. The court
    may, in its discretion, order up to double the amount of the victim's loss. RCW
    9.94A.753(3); 
    Griffith, 164 Wash. 2d at 966
    .
    Mr. Mandoli pleaded guilty to possessing two loads of stolen copper. Alcoa
    claimed losses of $24,258.00, based on two loads of approximately 3,900 pounds each
    times $3 .11 per pound. Mr. Mandoli contends the sales receipts reasonably support the
    conclusion that he and Mr. Frederick possessed only 3,833 pounds of copper in total. But
    3
    No. 33524-1-III
    State v. Mandoli
    the State also produced credible evidence from Mr. Frederick that each load weighed
    either 3,023 pounds or 30 to 40 percent less than the 3,895-pound third load. The trial
    court accepted Mr. Frederick's testimony as credible that the first two loads were
    somewhat smaller than the third load. Thus, the trial court had a reasonable basis for
    estimating that the first two loads were 3 5 percent smaller than the third load.
    The trial court's calculations do not, however, support restitution for $17,945.00.
    Although neither party mentions it, the trial court's conclusion that 2,885 pounds
    represents 35 percent less than the third load is erroneous. Thirty-five percent less than
    3,895 pounds is actually 2,532 pounds. 1 That amount doubled-for the two loads-is
    5,064 pounds. Multiplied by the agreed price of $3.11 per pound, the total restitution that
    should have been imposed based on the trial court's method of calculation is $15,749.00.
    CONCLUSION
    On this record, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing
    restitution based on a calculation that the first two loads were each 35 percent smaller
    than the third load, and multiplied by a value of $3 .11 per pound. We remand, however,
    for correction of the calculation error consistent with this opinion.
    Affirmed in part and remanded.
    1
    3,895 x 65 percent equals 2,532, rounded.
    4
    No. 33524-1-111
    State v. Mandoli
    A majority of the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in the
    Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to RCW
    2.06.040.
    WE CONCUR:
    Pennell, J.
    5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 33524-1

Filed Date: 6/16/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021