State of Washington v. Melissa Lynne Kerns ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                 II
    FILED
    Aug. 9, 2016
    In the Office of the Clerk of Court
    WA State Court of Appeals, Division Ill   I
    I
    l
    II
    I
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
    DIVISION THREE
    II
    STATE OF WASHINGTON,                         )                                                  i
    )         No. 33831-2-111
    Respondent,             )
    V.
    )
    )
    I
    MELISSA LYNN KERNS,
    )
    )
    UNPUBLISHED OPINION                      I
    !
    )
    Appellant.               )
    )
    I
    Pennell, J. -Following Melissa Kems's convictions for attempting to elude a
    police vehicle and hit and run (injury accident), the sentencing court imposed legal            I
    II
    financial obligations (LFOs) that included a mandatory $100 deoxyribonucleic acid
    I
    (DNA) collection fee under RCW 43.43.7541. We affirm.
    FACTS
    A jury found Ms. Kerns guilty as charged of attempting to elude a police vehicle
    and hit and run (injury accident). Her criminal history included 10 prior felony
    convictions. The court rejected her request for a prison-based Drug Offender Sentencing
    No. 33831-2-III
    State v. Kerns
    Alternative (DOSA) sentence upon determining she was not a suitable candidate. The
    court imposed concurrent sentences of 29 and 60 months respectively for the crimes. The
    court also imposed only mandatory LFOs, including a $500 victim assessment, a $200
    criminal filing fee, and a $100 DNA collection fee. Ms. Kerns did not object to
    imposition of any of the LFOs and did not raise any constitutional claims regarding the
    DNA collection fee.
    ANALYSIS
    Ms. Kerns contends the $100 DNA collection fee mandated by RCW 43.43.7541
    violates substantive due process and equal protection. Identical arguments have been
    rejected by this court previously. State v. Lewis, No. 72637-4-I, 
    2016 WL 3570550
    (Wash. Ct. App. June 27, 2016); State v. Johnson, No. 32834-1-III, 
    2016 WL 3124893
    (Wash. Ct. App. June 2, 2016); State v. Mathers, 
    193 Wn. App. 913
    , _        P.3d _
    (2016). We reject them here as well.
    STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL GROUNDS
    In her statement of addit.ional grounds for review, Ms. Kerns makes two claims
    that she was denied ineffective assistance of counsel: ( 1) counsel refused to call witnesses
    and failed to present 911 records, hospital records or possible photos of recent
    abuse/death threats-all of which she contends would have corroborated her duress
    defense, and (2) counsel failed to use any past drug evaluations or request a new
    drug/mental health evaluation to support her request for a DOSA sentence.
    2
    No. 33831-2-III
    State v. Kerns
    To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Ms. Kerns must
    establish both deficient performance and resulting prejudice. Strickland v. Washington,
    
    466 U.S. 668
    , 687-88, 
    104 S. Ct. 2052
    , 
    80 L. Ed. 2d 674
     (1984); State v. McFarland, 
    127 Wn.2d 322
    , 334-35, 
    899 P.2d 1251
     (1995). But her complaints relate to materials
    outside the trial court record. Ms. Kerns' s avenue for bringing claims based on evidence
    outside the record is through a personal restraint petition, not an appeal. McFarland, 
    127 Wn.2d at 335
    .
    Affirmed.
    A majority of the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in the
    Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to RCW
    2.06.040.
    Pennell, J.
    WE CONCUR:
    j
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 33831-2

Filed Date: 8/9/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021