Rankins v. Moats ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 95-7256
    MICHAEL RANKINS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    JEFF FOSSETT; RONALD CARTER; THOMAS D. CARR;
    JAMES PRIEST; WINSTON LLOYD; JAMES A.
    BRITTINGHAM, JR.; JEROME BAYLOR,
    Plaintiffs,
    versus
    RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP
    ROBINSON,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    No. 95-7257
    JEFF FOSSETT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    MICHAEL RANKINS; RONALD CARTER; THOMAS D.
    CARR; JAMES PRIEST; WINSTON LLOYD; JAMES A.
    BRITTINGHAM, JR.; JEROME BAYLOR,
    Plaintiffs,
    versus
    RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP
    ROBINSON,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    No. 95-7258
    RONALD CARTER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    MICHAEL RANKINS; JEFF FOSSETT; THOMAS D. CARR;
    JAMES PRIEST; WINSTON LLOYD; JAMES A.
    BRITTINGHAM, JR.; JEROME BAYLOR,
    Plaintiffs,
    versus
    RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP
    ROBINSON,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    No. 95-7259
    THOMAS D. CARR,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    2
    and
    MICHAEL RANKINS; JEFF FOSSETT; RONALD CARTER;
    JAMES PRIEST; WINSTON LLOYD; JAMES A.
    BRITTINGHAM, JR.; JEROME BAYLOR,
    Plaintiffs,
    versus
    RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP
    ROBINSON,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    No. 95-7260
    JAMES PRIEST,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    MICHAEL RANKINS; JEFF FOSSETT; RONALD CARTER;
    THOMAS D. CARR; WINSTON LLOYD; JAMES A.
    BRITTINGHAM, JR.; JEROME BAYLOR,
    Plaintiffs,
    versus
    RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP
    ROBINSON,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    3
    No. 95-7261
    WINSTON LLOYD,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    MICHAEL RANKINS; JEFF FOSSETT; RONALD CARTER;
    THOMAS D. CARR; JAMES PRIEST; JAMES A.
    BRITTINGHAM, JR.; JEROME BAYLOR,
    Plaintiffs,
    versus
    RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP
    ROBINSON,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    No. 95-7262
    JAMES A. BRITTINGHAM, JR.,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    MICHAEL RANKINS; JEFF FOSSETT; RONALD CARTER;
    THOMAS D. CARR; JAMES PRIEST; WINSTON LLOYD;
    JEROME BAYLOR,
    Plaintiffs,
    versus
    4
    RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP
    ROBINSON,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    No. 95-7263
    JEROME BAYLOR,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    MICHAEL RANKINS; JEFF FOSSETT; RONALD CARTER;
    THOMAS D. CARR; JAMES PRIEST; WINSTON LLOYD;
    JAMES A. BRITTINGHAM, JR.,
    Plaintiffs,
    versus
    RONALD MOATS, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM; BISHOP
    ROBINSON,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
    (CA-95-1982-JFM)
    Submitted:   January 11, 1996            Decided:   January 24, 1996
    Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    5
    Michael Rankins, Jeff Fossett, Ronald Carter, Thomas D. Carr, James
    Priest, Winston Lloyd, James A. Brittingham, Jr., Jerome Baylor,
    Appellants Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Appellants appeal from the district court's orders denying
    relief on their 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (1988) complaints. We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Rankins v. Moats, No. CA-95-1982-JFM (D. Md. July
    26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    6
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-7256

Filed Date: 1/24/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021