Verizon New York, Inc. v. Barlam Construction Corp. , 934 N.Y.2d 917 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present — Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Lindley, Green and Martoche, JJ.

Document Info

Docket Number: Appeal No. 1

Citation Numbers: 90 A.D.3d 1537, 934 N.Y.2d 917

Filed Date: 12/23/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2022