John S. Boosinger v. Precision Castparts Corp. ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                              STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
    SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
    FILED
    JOHN S. BOOSINGER,                                                              December 19, 2017
    Claimant Below, Petitioner                                                   EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK
    SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
    OF WEST VIRGINIA
    vs.)   No. 16-1090 (BOR Appeal No. 2051270)
    (Claim No. 2015019731)
    PRECISION CASTPARTS CORPORATION,
    Employer Below, Respondent
    MEMORANDUM DECISION
    Petitioner John S. Boosinger, by Edwin H. Pancake, his attorney, appeals the decision of
    the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. Precision Castparts Corporation,
    by Marion E. Ray, its attorney, filed a timely response.
    The issue on appeal is the compensability of Mr. Boosinger’s injury as well as
    authorization for medical benefits. The claims administrator denied a request for physical
    therapy and a steroid injection for the right knee on June 15, 2015. On June 16, 2015, the claims
    administrator corrected a prior January 28, 2015, decision and rejected the claim. The Office of
    Judges affirmed the decisions in its April 13, 2016, Order. The Order was affirmed by the Board
    of Review on October 24, 2016. The Court has carefully reviewed the records, written
    arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is mature for consideration.
    This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal
    arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided
    by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record
    presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these
    reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate
    Procedure.
    Mr. Boosinger, an electronic yardman, filed an employees’ and physicians’ report of
    occupational injury on January 20, 2015, alleging that he was walking the rails when his left
    knee gave out on him and he fell, catching himself with his right hand on a railcar. He reported
    injuries to his right hand and wrist. The physician’s section indicated a diagnosis of
    hyperextended right thumb. It was reported that the injury aggravated a prior injury or disease in
    that Mr. Boosinger has previously undergone surgery on his right hand. The employer’s report of
    1
    occupational injury indicates Mr. Boosinger’s left knee gave out while he was walking by the rail
    car. He caught himself with his right hand and overextended his hand and wrist causing a strain.
    A January 20, 2015, treatment note from St. Mary’s Urgent Care indicates Mr. Boosinger
    reported that his left knee gave out and he put his hand out and hyperextended his right thumb on
    a railcar at work. His medical history included a history of arthritis and surgeries on the left knee,
    left hand, right hand, right arm, and bilateral rotator cuffs. The assessment was sprain of the right
    wrist/hand. An x-ray of the right wrist revealed probable chronic changes at the base of the first
    metacarpal. A more acute avulsion injury was not entirely excluded. It was reported that he has
    previously undergone a joint replacement at the site of the injury.
    A treatment note by Allen Young, M.D., on January 21, 2015, indicates Mr. Boosinger
    had a history of problems with the hand/wrist when he had degeneration of the scaphoid bone in
    the bilateral wrists for which bilateral wrist surgery was performed. He had worked since the
    injury. Dr. Young’s assessment was sprain/strain of the right wrist. Two days later, Mr.
    Boosinger’s wrist was still swollen and achy. The assessment remained the same. The claims
    administrator held the claim compensable for wrist strain on January 28, 2015.
    A January 30, 2015, treatment note by Alan Koester, M.D., indicates an assessment of
    wrist sprain. It was noted that Mr. Boosinger returned following a reinjury of his thumb in which
    his knee gave out and he fell. A left knee MRI taken on February 23, 2015, showed a torn
    anterior cruciate ligament, likely chronic. There was also evidence of prior arthroscopy. The
    claims administrator granted authorization for orthopedic consultation at Marshall University
    Orthopedics on March 10, 2015. On March 13, 2015, Dr. Koester noted that Mr. Boosinger
    returned for evaluation of his right wrist following a fall and sprain in January 2015. The
    impression was right wrist sprain, early arthritis, and possible degenerative fibrocartilage tear.
    In an April 15, 2015, treatment note, Jerry Ambrosia, M.D., noted that Mr. Boosinger
    was seen for knee pain following a work incident two and a half months prior when his knee
    buckled on him. He had a history of chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency for the past
    twenty years. It was Dr. Ambrosia’s impression that he sprained his knee. X-rays of the left knee
    were negative for any sort of degenerative process. The MRI of the right knee showed
    obliteration of the anterior cruciate ligament. Mr. Boosinger reported occasional giving away
    episodes with the left knee. Dr. Ambrosia wanted to order physical therapy.
    A treatment note by James Reagan, M.D., dated May 19, 2015, indicates Mr. Boosinger
    reported that he had experienced anterior cruciate ligament problems since he was thirty-nine but
    the most recent problems arose after he twisted it on January 20, 2015. The assessment was left
    knee anterior cruciate ligament deficiency status post knee sprain several months prior. Dr.
    Reagan noted Mr. Boosinger did not report feelings of instability until the twisting incident on
    January 20, 2015.
    On November 12, 2015, Mr. Boosinger testified in a deposition that on January 20, 2015,
    he was walking from one area to another when he slipped or his knee gave out and he fell,
    catching himself with his right hand. He was not having problems with the right hand prior to the
    2
    fall. His knee did not initially hurt a great deal but a few days after the injury occurred, it began
    to hurt. Mr. Boosinger testified that his claim was held compensable on January 28, 2015, and he
    received treatment. He stated that he had two prior left knee injuries, a torn meniscus and a torn
    anterior cruciate ligament.
    In a December 22, 2015, record review, Prasadarao Mukkamala, M.D., opined that Mr.
    Boosinger did not sustain an occupational injury on January 20, 2015. He had medical evidence
    of chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency of the left knee for several years. Mr. Boosinger
    himself reported that on the day in question his left knee gave out resulting in him falling and
    catching himself with his right hand. Dr. Mukkamala stated that the reason the left knee gave out
    was because he has a chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Dr. Mukkamala further noted
    that while Mr. Boosinger reported right wrist pain immediately, he did not mention left knee pain
    until February 13, 2015, more than three weeks later. Dr. Mukkamala concluded that Mr.
    Boosinger did not sustain a compensable work injury because he fell due to a chronic knee
    condition, not his employment.
    The claims administrator denied a request for physical therapy for the right knee and
    steroid injection to the right knee on June 15, 2015. On June 16, 2015, it corrected the January
    28, 2015, decision and rejected the claim. The Office of Judges affirmed the decisions in its
    April 13, 2016, Order. It found that neither the left or right knee were held compensable.
    Therefore, there was no error in the claims administrator’s June 15, 2015, decision to deny
    treatment. Mr. Boosinger asserted that he injured his left knee on January 20, 2015. He stated
    that it did not hurt much initially, but a few days later he had increased pain. However, he did not
    report increased pain until three weeks after the incident occurred, as Dr. Mukkamala also
    observed. The Office of Judges further found that Mr. Boosinger’s explanation of what happened
    has been inconsistent. He initially reported that his knee gave out and he fell. However, on April
    15, 2015, he told Dr. Ambrosia that he hurt his knee at work a few months prior when his knee
    buckled on him. Dr. Ambrosia noted that Mr. Boosinger had chronic anterior cruciate ligament
    deficiency for twenty years and had undergone three arthroscopies. On May 19, 2015, Dr.
    Reagan noted that Mr. Boosinger did not report feelings of instability in the left knee until he
    twisted it several months prior. However, he reported to Dr. Ambrosia that he has occasional
    giving away episodes which caused pain and made certain activities difficult. Dr. Ambrosia
    stated that this was due to a chronic anterior cruciate ligament tear. The Office of Judges
    ultimately concluded that Mr. Boosinger’s left knee gave way, as he himself stated in the report
    of injury, and that it gave way due to his chronic left knee condition. Accordingly, there was no
    isolated, fortuitous event attributable to his employment and the injury is therefore not
    compensable. The right wrist sprain that resulted from the non-compensable left knee giving way
    was also found to be non-compensable. The Board of Review adopted the findings of fact and
    conclusions of law of the Office of Judges and affirmed its Order on October 24, 2016.
    After review, we agree with the reasoning and conclusions of the Office of Judges as
    affirmed by the Board of Review. For an injury to be compensable it must be a personal injury
    that was received in the course of employment, and it must have resulted from that employment.
    Barnett v. State Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner, 
    153 W.Va. 796
    , 
    172 S.E.2d 698
    (1970). In this case, though Mr. Boosinger was injured in the course of his employment, he was
    3
    not injured as a result of his employment. His knee gave way as a result of pre-existing
    conditions, causing him to fall. Since the injury is not compensable, the requested treatment was
    also properly denied.
    For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
    violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
    conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
    evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.
    Affirmed.
    ISSUED: December 19, 2017
    CONCURRED IN BY:
    Chief Justice Allen H. Loughry II
    Justice Robin J. Davis
    Justice Margaret L. Workman
    Justice Menis E. Ketchum
    Justice Elizabeth D. Walker
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-1090

Filed Date: 12/19/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/20/2017