This opinion cites 153 cases:

Ramos-Baez v. Bossolo-Lopez , 240 F.3d 92 ( 2001 )


Picard v. United Aircraft Corporation , 128 F.2d 632 ( 1942 )


Diamond International Corporation, a Corporation of Delaware v. Maryland Fresh Eggs, Inc., a Corporation of Maryland , 523 F.2d 113 ( 1975 )


Foster Cathead Company v. Malvern M. Hasha and International Tool Company, Inc. , 382 F.2d 761 ( 1967 )


Masco Corporation v. United States, and Mosler, Inc. And Hamilton Products Group, Inc., Third Party and Mas-Hamilton Group, Inc., Third Party , 303 F.3d 1316 ( 2002 )


advanced-display-systems-inc-and-bao-gang-wu-third-party-v-kent-state , 212 F.3d 1272 ( 2000 )


Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs Corporation , 158 F.3d 1243 ( 1998 )


Moba, B v. Staalkat, B v. and Fps Food Processing Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross v. Diamond Automation, Inc. , 325 F.3d 1306 ( 2003 )


cvibeta-ventures-inc-marchon-eyewear-inc-marcolin-usa-inc-and , 112 F.3d 1146 ( 1997 )


Del Mar Avionics, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Quinton Instrument Co., Appellant/cross-Appellee , 836 F.2d 1320 ( 1987 )


finnigan-corporation-v-international-trade-commission-and-bruker-franzen , 180 F.3d 1354 ( 1999 )


Faye Anastasoff v. United States , 235 F.3d 1054 ( 2000 )


Intellectual Property Development, Inc. And Communications Patents, Ltd. v. Ua-Columbia Cablevision of Westchester, Inc. And Tele-Communications, Inc. , 336 F.3d 1308 ( 2003 )


Faye Anastasoff v. United States , 223 F.3d 898 ( 2000 )


Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life Fitness , 288 F.3d 1359 ( 2002 )


personalized-media-communications-llc-v-international-trade-commission , 161 F.3d 696 ( 1999 )


texas-instruments-incorporated-v-united-states-international-trade , 988 F.2d 1165 ( 1993 )


In Re Leslie N. Wilder, James C. Whitney and Gary G. Matison, and Lanier Business Products, Intervenor , 736 F.2d 1516 ( 1984 )


Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant , 859 F.2d 878 ( 1989 )


Gary E. Rhine v. Casio, Incorporated and Casio Computer Co., Ltd. , 183 F.3d 1342 ( 1999 )